Re: [i2rs] WG Adoption call for draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability-03 from 11/24 to 12/9/14

Hi Joe,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 12:36 PM
> To: Nobo Akiya (nobo); Susan Hares; i2rs@ietf.org
> Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas'; 'Alia Atlas'
> Subject: Re: [i2rs] WG Adoption call for draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability-03 from
> 11/24 to 12/9/14
> 
> On 11/28/14 8:24 PM, Nobo Akiya (nobo) wrote:
> > Hi Sue, Jeff,
> >
> > The document describes a good framework which enables trace-ability of
> > the interactions amongst I2RS modules, and provides data points for
> > record/debugging purposes. I believe this framework provides a good
> > value, thus I support the adoption of this document as a WG document.
> >
> > I do have one question/comment to the authors but not a blocker for
> > its WG adoption.
> >
> > The Log Entity describe one Timestamp. What does this Timestamp
> describe?
> >
> > Realistically, I can see 4 possibilities.
> >
> > - Time when I2RS agent received the request from an I2RS client.
> >
> > - Time when I2RS agent made the request to the Routing System.
> >
> > - Time when I2RS agent received the reply from the Routing System.
> >
> > - Time when I2RS agent sent the reply to to the I2RS client.
> >
> > If one was attempting to make sense of a scaled number of requests
> > being processed by the I2RS agent (and some processed in parallel),
> > having more than one Timestamp in a Log Entry may provide more
> > insights into what was happening in the system.
> 
> This is a very good observation, Nobo.  Initially, we meant for the
> timestamp to be the time at which the agent received the request from the
> client (since the request may not complete).  But we should have another
> timestamp populated upon completion so that one can gage performance as
> well.

Sounds like a good change that will improve the value of the data (i.e. Log Entry), thus improving the value of this document ;-)

Thanks for considering my comment!

-Nobo

> 
> This is the kind of feedback we want, and hopefully this will help drive the
> work forward as a working group item.  Thanks.
> 
> Joe
> 
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -Nobo
> >
> > *From:*i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Susan Hares
> > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:03 AM
> > *To:* i2rs@ietf.org
> > *Cc:* 'Jeffrey Haas'; 'Alia Atlas'
> > *Subject:* [i2rs] WG Adoption call for
> > draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability-03 from 11/24 to 12/9/14
> >
> > This is to begin a 2 week adoption call for
> > draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability-03.  Please include in your comments an
> > indication of "support" or "no support."
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Sue Hares and Jeff Haas
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > i2rs mailing list
> > i2rs@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
> >