IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [i2rs] Call for WG Adoption: draft-keyupate-irs-bgp-usecases-02

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Sun, 28 July 2013 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D461B21F9EBE for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gM79mEGDcnfF for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC9721F9EB8 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7746; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375046770; x=1376256370; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=TImIu370AmUtZWOB5bIpbKXf86C+1UCqpE/7ijI3ipM=; b=OrFaVNZ2V2GVGYQPbkWD8iD6ol37Bxood2HApzFKDkI7Mp36lUsWtC5r pXXybQP+ItUEpIILEhlQDZ9MtSU/M1xpNd1rLJt/M8boWo4ifuto6Uxn7 Gd0e0H/zNsPlISzhZKT6BsqLkY6TyyWkCsaDvmbYBjXVB2B7iR+ZkGK5h M=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 203
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgFAL6L9VGtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABbgkJENVC9UoEXFnSCJAEBAQMBAQEBGlELBQsCAQgOCgokIQYLJQIEDgUIBodwAwkGDK4zDYhaBI0VgjctBAeDFm8DkBKBLYQ3jg+FJoMUgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,765,1367971200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217"; a="240580074"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2013 21:26:09 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6SLQ99v011042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:26:09 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.29]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:26:08 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [i2rs] Call for WG Adoption: draft-keyupate-irs-bgp-usecases-02
Thread-Index: AQHOi9kSmKu0V/1FPEais0WRTlMRPQ==
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:26:07 +0000
Message-ID: <95067C434CE250468B77282634C96ED322D5EB8E@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CAG4d1reyL5mC2bNC_3jyDYkXMJjD_Hy0349f9FOO=+KFsTM8dg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1reyL5mC2bNC_3jyDYkXMJjD_Hy0349f9FOO=+KFsTM8dg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.106.13]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_84DCFC75-088A-48BC-8CC4-64101D1C9C65"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "i2rs@ietf.org" <i2rs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Call for WG Adoption: draft-keyupate-irs-bgp-usecases-02
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:26:19 -0000

I support the adoption of this document by I2RS.

As the first "routing protocol" use-case document up for adoption, this will be a test of where the WG ought to focus. I do believe there is still an opportunity in this document to peel the onion more and also look at what things we cannot get easily with other interfaces, and (as others have said) topology (esp. virtual topologies) as well as policy, and less on config to bring up a neighbor. That said, this is a good start IMHO.

I have a large set of minor comments that I will send directly to the authors.

Thanks,

-- Carlos.

On Jul 25, 2013, at 12:09 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:

> And I've lost the ability to spell - apparently. 
> It's:  draft-keyupate-i2rs-bgp-usecases-00
> 
> Alia
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Note that:  draft-keyupdate-i2rs-bgp-usecases-00 has only the basic changes from IRS to I2RS compared to draft-keyupdate-irs-bgp-usecases-02.   Feel free to review and comment on draft-keyupdate-i2rs-bgp-usecases-00 instead.
> 
> Also - in this case, it is particularly important to have good conversation and discussion on the draft (unless you believe it is perfect) - to help guide the co-authors on how to improve the draft.
> 
> Regards,
> Alia
>  
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please review draft-keyupdate-irs-bgp-usecases-02 and comment on whether it should be adopted by I2RS.  Detailed technical conversation is also most welcome.
> 
> Authors: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-keyupdate-irs-bgp-usecases-02.  Is so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> This WG call for adoption will complete on August 12.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alia
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email