Re: [i2rs] draft-mglt-i2rs-security-environment-reqs, REQ 3

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 27 August 2015 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2206D1A1B69 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bMITkgM3NQUR for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 888161A8F4D for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwr7 with SMTP id wr7so26409730obb.2 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+XWxWzsKTA18/WXSutXqSQktkKmxtQoDLU6n/caUuBg=; b=d623Sbic96dG7Oxz2URv9/UJlqKn/ZvepnMlDjxa8fvN2UAaxCdSd/8wyj/+2A1Gjt N1FO7XybXJIaLh66lL2xkubMCc4ZWUoJH9nmtD+z59sPgZ4StMaExV09GpGBOZlhCTdG t3ZBtqhWfhJ8CsbtJX7zIq++XnROej0g0khRUGu4yiJYxcCQaJKz50+aAFphVxtg46Ks hg05upEv6KDfnTNuuWFC378Sy+5IwEyxHYC8Fn06TNxSZbkeiBQlizHpKGV2S24ZRN0j AjoKgIozqjDHM+ecGft1k8Z0ertMVPY/qNOqu0I46kvk6MrMZtBSV1ejjDGM0IFRNEOe teNQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.171.35 with SMTP id ar3mr3604772obc.57.1440707558017; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.176.138 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150827203209.GB19039@pfrc.org>
References: <20150827203209.GB19039@pfrc.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:32:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rco35EtNXuPCR77xqHCgcbPEOu6Atb3SMu5r33XGiZ25g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8ff1cde238a880051e50de93"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/A3uMIeIXObjXwNejxh_pSnq14KE>
Cc: "i2rs@ietf.org" <i2rs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] draft-mglt-i2rs-security-environment-reqs, REQ 3
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:32:44 -0000

<no-hats>

Good catch - this seems to be very aspirational and contradicts
what the architecture says - which is basically that the user may
cause issues.

Regards,
Alia
</no-hats>

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

> I've been reviewing the environment requirements, thanks for picking up
> this
> work.  Requirement 3 contains the following:
>
>    REQ 3:  The I2RS Agent validates data to ensure injecting the
>            information will not create a deadlock with any other system,
>            nor will it create a routing loop, nor will it cause the
>            control plane to fail to converge.
>
> I2RS has already received feedback from our netconf experts expressing
> concern over how validation even at the schema levels may introduce
> excessive latency.  This contradicts the I2RS "need for speed".
>
> I have a broader concern that the above requirement may simply be an
> intractable problem.  It's a loft goal, but the overhead in validating all
> such things is likely not within the goal of speed.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -- Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
>