[i2rs] Benoit Claise's Abstain on draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement-10: (with COMMENT)

"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 18 February 2016 10:06 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160218100630.19038.4953.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 02:06:30 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/UILDb8MSHEGorl-dT9mNc9rNBiM>
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org, bill.wu@huawei.com, draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement@ietf.org, i2rs-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [i2rs] Benoit Claise's Abstain on draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement-10: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement-10: Abstain

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I basically agree with Alvaro's points. On top of that, a problem
statement in 2016 when the charter was done in 2012 ... hmm ... 
If (parts of) the content needs be published, it should be in the arch
document. Figure 1 is architecture anyway, right?
And ... a problem statement with a normative reference to an
architecture. Really?

[i2rs] Benoit Claise's Abstain on draft-ietf-i2rs… Benoit Claise
Re: [i2rs] Benoit Claise's Abstain on draft-ietf-… Susan Hares