Re: [Ianaplan] comments on draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01

[Milton L Mueller <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> > _avoid_ an overlap.  I'd like to see the first bullet say, "These
> > registries require coordination with the Generic Names Support
> > Organization (GNSO) in order to avoid an overlap."
> 
> I agree with this point and, barring objection, I propose to make changes to
> address your point.

Agree with Andrew's critique and look forward to the revised language.

> >
> > [jurisdiction] is a bad idea, and should be removed.
> 
> 
> The argument put forth to add this text was that if we don't, the first few
> million dollars spent in a dispute would be on figuring out the answer.  That
> is the argument that has to be addressed.
> 

Obviously Eliot is right here. 

> 
> So long as there is agreement that "iana.org" is one of those "marks and
> identifiers", I am comfortable with the above.  In my opinion, I believe the
> above text is more likely to achieve consensus than other versions of the
> text.  However, I would ask that others comment.

My comment is that the more specific the language, the better; i.e., the more likely it is to clarify the situation and avoid future disputes and wrangling. 

--MM