Re: [Ianaplan] comments on draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01

["Richard Hill" <[e-mail]>]

Dear Eliot,

I'm OK with the language in 01, which I see is included in 02.

Best,
Richard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ianaplan [mailto:[e-mail]]On Behalf Of Eliot Lear
> Sent: lundi, 27. octobre 2014 15:11
> To: [e-mail]; Andrew Sullivan; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] comments on draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01
> 
> 
> Hi Richard,
> 
> On 10/24/14, 8:59 AM, Richard Hill wrote:
> > In contrast to Andrew, I think that it is important to say 
> something substantive about jurisdiction. So, if the above text 
> is not acceptable to all, then I propose to replace it with the following.
> >
> > "The IAOC is asked to conclude a supplemental agreement 
> regarding jurisdiction and any necessary dispute resolution 
> mechanisms, taking into account that it may be preferable to 
> specify a neutral jurisdiction such as arbitration in Switzerland."
> >
> > Please note that I would prefer that the following also be 
> included, but I recognize that there might not be much support for this:
> >
> > "Further, the IAOC is asked to consider whether it would be 
> appropriate for the IANA function to be legally domiciled in a 
> neutral jurisdiction such as Switzerland, possibily with immunity 
> of jurisdiction."
> >
> > Please note that my proposals above are consistent with the 
> comments from the Just Net Coalition, which the ICG has 
> transmitted to this group for its consideration, see 32 of the 
> paper referenced at:
> >
> >   http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/current/msg00423.html 
> 
> It's probably sufficient to state that the IAOC should address the
> matter of jurisdiction, without getting into "where" in this document. 
> The issue with the above text is that we could spend the rest of the
> time going through last call to determine which jurisdictions be
> considered, and none of us are lawyers (and on this particular issue, I
> won't even play one on the 'net).  I would expect the IAOC to bring
> appropriate resources to bear to properly address this issue.
> 
> Eliot
> 
>