Re: [Ianaplan] Update on IANA Transition & Negotiations with ICANN

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Fri, 01 May 2015 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C9A1AD0D0 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2015 06:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nSZ3FQerNYip for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2015 06:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [50.116.54.116]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6C91AD362 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2015 06:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B59106B1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2015 13:09:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjRXwd7biVWX for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2015 13:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (unknown [85.159.94.18]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25B8A10636 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2015 13:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 14:09:48 +0100
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150501130948.GF68855@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <20150430115751.GE65715@mx2.yitter.info> <CAD_dc6iu74FVHGq+17zzT2Yb-deQ1WeP8UNZcakUs7Hq1LXUtg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAD_dc6iu74FVHGq+17zzT2Yb-deQ1WeP8UNZcakUs7Hq1LXUtg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/F-ksgwmmEKeyiVhXxGo62crQoAI>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Update on IANA Transition & Negotiations with ICANN
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 13:10:06 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 07:25:10PM +0100, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> 
> Do I understand this to mean that IETF  wants to get it's RFP response to
> ICG activated and operational before conclusion of the transition process?

I don't think so.

I just reviewed the minutes from IETF 91 at
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/minutes/minutes-91-ianaplan.  To
me, it was plain that we were just planning to include items in our
negotiation this year (I spent about 3 minutes looking for an email
thread to that effect, too, in which I seem to recall having
participated).  None of that negotiation entails that it needs to be
completed before the ICG has proceeded. 

Best regards,

A (as ever, speaking for myself)

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com