[Ianaplan] Update and next steps for IANAPLAN WG

"Leslie Daigle" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Thu, 10 March 2016 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB9012DAF7 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:24:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=thinkingcat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mnyPoR7kpzky for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:23:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AE1212DA68 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:21:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB575940F1; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:21:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; h=from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; s=thinkingcat.com; bh=Yy4C/2pUCHR+Bce klNik7uEJORk=; b=n00oXqtQKuMMCu9Yd99N8rnGynELMtaQejCPvB6IeC2uOyI gFjFhp0/i8jyD541sJ26URyawd3NojKhC2MbklmVLnMFVGFlz7XJIjc+YaVmDVZJ MrK0z0pannXAyjjlhWlR6iCgMGXH9RVEFvulnioL9F5fZLq4cpvHtXORAkG8=
Received: from [192.168.0.23] (CPE-104-244-129-226.trans-video.net [104.244.129.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: leslie@oceanpurl.net) by homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FC4F5940E7; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:21:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:21:11 -0500
Message-ID: <10F333D8-3B03-4B50-92AF-51935619D181@thinkingcat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.3r5187)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/aiUp8bpcj-q1OJ08wxl2AgDhIJM>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Subject: [Ianaplan] Update and next steps for IANAPLAN WG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:24:01 -0000

Following up the notice that Marc shared earlier:  not only has the ICG 
shared the combined plan with the ICANN board, today the ICANN board has 
voted in favour of accepting the unified IANA transition proposal, for 
which the IANAPLAN WG’s document captured the requirements of the IETF 
for the protocol parameter part of IANA.

As a next step, the transition proposal is being sent to NTIA as the 
community plan to move forward consistently with the requirements laid 
out by the NTIA at the beginning of this process.  It is now up to the 
NTIA process to review the proposal in the light of those requirements.

Implementation can’t actually complete until there is formal 
acceptance from the NTIA/USG, but it’s not too soon to plan.   The 
bodies responsible for management of the parts of the proposal are 
moving forward in discussions of how to implement the proposal.

For that reason, we are holding a slot for the IANAPLAN WG to meet in 
Buenos Aires, should there be specific material requiring community 
input in that timeframe.

We will be providing an agenda for the meeting as that becomes apparent, 
or otherwise canceling the session if there is no practical need for it.

Leslie.

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises LLC
ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------