Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 10 August 2015 02:27 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1F31A88A5 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 19:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ouh35e91qYLJ for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 19:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3A41A8843 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 19:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261B92CC9B; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:27:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c2gCXP61uMtt; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:27:10 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1102CC5C; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:27:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3481B144-5ADE-47D4-AC15-1FD9D0CA9EB9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <55C7F778.4030606@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 23:27:08 -0300
Message-Id: <1D29FFD5-DF80-4208-A57B-83AC19F9DE47@piuha.net>
References: <55C7F3D8.2060600@gmail.com> <55C7F778.4030606@meetinghouse.net>
To: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/bazrqzVjeI5NzyCabPOwx6BVjJs>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 02:27:14 -0000
Sigh. (Then again, this is what you get when _anybody_ can comment. But open processes are still the right way. However, and speaking for myself only, anybody being able to comment does not equate to all comments being equally valuable; the well justified and reasoned opinion is always appreciated. I trust that the ICG will be able to sort the feedback appropriately.) But I very much agree with Brian’s suggestion. Jari
- [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments Jari Arkko
- Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments John R Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments John C Klensin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments Alan Greenberg
- Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments JFC Morfin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Ianaplan] Off topic: public comments Narelle