[Ianaplan] draft-lear-iana-icg-response-01 (was: "The mechanisms required to address the removal of the overarching NTIA contract may require additional documentation or agreements.")

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Eliot,

[I changed the topic as it may be easier to track.]

At 21:40 23-09-2014, Eliot Lear wrote:
>We do not single out the IANA registry.  Rather ALL of our decisions 
>should follow that framework.  See RFC 6852 that the IAB released in 
>January of 2013, as mentioned in our current draft.

My reading of the above is that it is different from a position taken 
by the IAB after January 2013 and before October 2013.

For what it worth the position of the IESG was that RFC 6852 was not 
subject to IETF review and approval.  draft-lear-iana-icg-response-01 
has the following:

   "The IETF operates an open and transparent manner [RFC6852]."

I do not think that the reference is appropriate as the document has 
not been subject to IETF review and approval.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy