Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG

Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> Mon, 16 February 2015 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A541A1B7D for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:54:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NQEXIPkjfaHs for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from trammell.ch (trammell.ch [5.148.172.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A43F1A00F3 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:10ec:2a49:8000::ce] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:10ec:2a49:8000::ce]) by trammell.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 389F51A07BE; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:54:22 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:54:21 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CACD346D-65BD-4C5B-88FB-4A7716372729@trammell.ch>
References: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com>
To: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/wEOhK76BgBYxNRDMRG7lJYK7WUE>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, "Leslie Daigle \(ThinkingCat\)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:55:00 -0000

> On 16 Feb 2015, at 17:03, Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat) <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>; wrote:
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> There seems to be general agreement that there is not an incompatibility between the RIR proposal requirement and the IETF's proposal.
> 
> We would like to determine if there is consensus on the following points, as expressed by Dave Crocker (thanks!) on February 9, 2015:
> 
>    With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, both
> are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a
> particular IANA Numbering Services Operator.
> 
>    The IETF considers the IETF Trust to be an acceptable candidate for
> holding the trademark and domain.
> 
>    The IETF would support a decision by the IETF Trust to hold the
> IANA mark, and iana.org domain in behalf of the Internet community.
> 
> 
> 
> If there are objections to these points, please let us know by 00h00 UTC on February 19, 2015.

This seems extremely reasonable. +1.

Cheers,

Brian

> Leslie/Marc.
> 
> -- 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Leslie Daigle
> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan