Re: [Iasa20] Diagrams of current vs. Option 2/3

Hi Richard,

I note that your diagram includes the IETF Trust, which is not part of this
discussion since it already had a separate legal existence.  I think it
would be cleaner to remove it, especially since the relationship is not
that the IAOC administers the IETF Trust, as this diagram describes it.
The Trustees do; they simply are currently defined in terms of the trust.
I agree that this would need adjustment if the IAOC disappeared, but that's
really a very separate question than the core of the IASA 2.0 work.  On a
related note, the IAD also serves as an ex-officio, non-voting member of
the IAOC (that's why the IAD is a Trustee).

Lastly, this is certainly one way to look at what might get created but it
presumes some structures (like an advisory council and the IETF Admin Org
board having some members selected by the board itself) which have not been
in any of the proposals I've seen.  If the proposals out of the design team
plan to include those, I think having them in drafts before London would be
very useful.

thanks,

Ted

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> As we're considering the various options available, I thought I would play
> cartoonist again (after contributing [1] earlier) and share some diagrams
> of how processes might change if we go for one of the subsidiary options
> (II or III in the memo from the lawyers).  Based on a whiteboard that
> Alissa, Sean, and I sketched out one afternoon:
>
> https://ipv.sx/iasa2.0/IASA-Strawman.pdf
>
> Obviously, the details will need to change as a result of the legal
> discussion, but I thought it would be useful to illustrate one possible
> realization here.
>
> --Richard
>
> [1] https://ipv.sx/iasa2.0/IASA-org-charts.pdf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> iasa20 mailing list
> iasa20@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20
>
>