[Iasa20] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-05: (with COMMENT)
Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 19 August 2019 15:32 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietf.org
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCD9120106; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis@ietf.org, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org, iasa20@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <156622875150.19964.5947846035411249572.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:32:31 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/gxmbyRP9lzv7ER87dl-6EzEdC1E>
Subject: [Iasa20] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called IASA 2.0 project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 15:32:32 -0000
Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Two easy to address comments: (1) §1: "As a result of the the IASA 2.0 structure [I-D.ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis] and formation of the IETF LLC, the relationship between the IETF and ISOC has changed." I think that I-D.ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis should be a Normative reference. (2) I-D.ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis uses this document as a Normative reference, and points to it when defining ISOC (in §4.1); but there is no explicit reference to ISOC, or even its mission (which seems to be quoted in §2). Please add one.
- [Iasa20] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ie… Alvaro Retana via Datatracker
- Re: [Iasa20] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draf… Livingood, Jason