IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ice] Status of draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 22 December 2016 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5539F129550; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:23:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gNCmFbn5dKWX; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15A8B129880; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.39] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uBMJNcEF065276 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:23:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.39]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness@ietf.org, ice@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness.shepherd@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:23:38 -0600
Message-ID: <76D44858-C06C-4D88-83CF-3C5597254F22@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <A451E086-C695-448A-8B13-1CC6D4F9BEE0@nostrum.com>
References: <A451E086-C695-448A-8B13-1CC6D4F9BEE0@nostrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5318)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ice/HcUQaUJ3bDj_b1kWQnk3giFyQKU>
Subject: Re: [Ice] Status of draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness
X-BeenThere: ice@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interactive Connectivity Establishment \(ICE\)" <ice.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ice/>
List-Post: <mailto:ice@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:23:41 -0000

The repeat-repeat LC has completed without further comment. Given that 
the IESG discussion explicitly assumed the BCP status, I plan to approve 
this version for publication.

Thanks!

Ben.

On 12 Dec 2016, at 15:40, Ben Campbell wrote:

[...]


>
> When we originally did the IETF LC for 
> draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness, we did so as if it were intended as 
> informational, while the correct status was BCP. I agreed to re-run 
> the LC as a BCP. Otherwise I think we dealt with all the comments.
>
> But when I re-ran the last call, I got my wires crossed and misstated 
> the status _again_.
>
> So at this point, I think the right thing to do is yet another LC with 
> the correct status. I think it reasonable to shorten this to 1 week, 
> since the draft has been heavily reviewed already, and we are 
> essentially asking one question.
>
> Does anyone object to that course?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ben.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ice mailing list
> Ice@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email