IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not we should meet at IETF 105

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Thu, 11 July 2019 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493F4120075 for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.204
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UegNF681i7Lf for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92a.google.com (mail-ua1-x92a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13F2A120052 for <ice@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92a.google.com with SMTP id c4so1657511uad.1 for <ice@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Wn6mUHJv6ApnGtVNCTSxn231RAcKaOvz7I/NXCLhPBI=; b=JvPfKvuSe+BC2Earvb4pKcmuRLs+HTqWqsemeOVOLnyQjLOSI+Zlbb0Rk4vrBJS4X8 MFP2KxDSVs5Goj4IjdVkhF19OwNeg08ZJPXI+6/Fx9lZCEQWnE3FXXtCrwXmmv4TQcMZ z5gNdFYzp51AiLbeubgzar+lVD/JKqZtG3Nplr8122TINzbtjviRRVxRozQESQlF5Rfm Uc9JM6akwHN797d7wiVjdCJ4yRYAvIv8hmOX5Z8YPYS7trebjf8CDhp+YAKAgr11friK X1tub4WDbMkYdA+FtHng/1+WFYDyic/phJ97DC29EtHHCqSlL7FeK2bcTiMv3LjOaT9Y NBOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wn6mUHJv6ApnGtVNCTSxn231RAcKaOvz7I/NXCLhPBI=; b=AR6LS2SMi+hOLnWndVoTA8JjS6e7bJ5tQSjfNlDNoImADF06D+k+288CYS+RdNQer8 vc6fhXrpT3v4VYhU+PaWEWdGlenvfzHtNqA+eJVn+owU9m/uIn5d/NF3VCtcvdY5g7+7 GXXaOhBQnPiksiTqxxHtt8azdWAtcU6Y6UGHDfJiJgqNEC/eApiatLuukzrsDB8Lsqw3 dSZz/IXewsxmANeXawp8upiOYD7Dr3lw4TXsL6mj4Hgke8gxqWdbmIzqqJfIJF6DVyM7 5kzgNcSwto14BpBMhrWQcUvsn4vvddwJntbflQehq+Uco7wcyHh1JgAB8EENiHNE4vG+ j8CQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXWa8RiYCb8gQjBtJgrA0KynhZWxY0G87wDURl5vXbE/XWOnSfr kbBzUc1U77ZOtLk5Gza8l4FMjSrlwe8ROPwaaJwoXwOBumaOdg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwl20Wf13yTIx5LTooKJbgWAyKmKlZbsLQ694VW1v8TBFTfHFY/FD/fIw/CIHAEEe5maETJxLgHVwKWjYt3bR8=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:1c2:: with SMTP id 60mr552795ual.78.1562806613372; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJrXDUGdixUj7EbQg=p7Vi25gik=Ut5fGWAFF8gAGGoUSZJMDg@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB31617368E73EF0DDF489C9C793F10@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAJrXDUFUipHR1qyYJTn6TmY=45sT4G3VXkhdTWs-vN4yBceD4Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUFUipHR1qyYJTn6TmY=45sT4G3VXkhdTWs-vN4yBceD4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:56:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-2bvngzKCFrVATLk6ZtZavZh3e5CFpKMRTXP2pXSQH=qQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, ICE WG <ice@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000b5fcc058d5d45bf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ice/Oq8dT1d3xrUTNK_ZFiGKZvE1kt4>
Subject: Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not we should meet at IETF 105
X-BeenThere: ice@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interactive Connectivity Establishment \(ICE\)" <ice.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ice/>
List-Post: <mailto:ice@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:56:57 -0000

This was fixed in https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/18.

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 5:51 PM Peter Thatcher <pthatcher=
40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 12:50 AM Christer Holmberg <
> christer..holmberg@ericsson.com <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> >It appears to me that nearly all of the issues with ICE-PAC have been
>> discussed and reached a conclusion and >solution with the following PRs:
>>
>> >
>>
>> >https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/15
>>
>> >https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/16
>>
>> >https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/17
>>
>> >
>>
>> >Once we merge those PRs, nearly all of the issues of ICE-PAC will be
>> resolved and we can likely move to WGLC.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am happy to work with the PRs above. However, unless I’ve missed it,
>> they do not cover what happens if the timer expires while ICE is still
>> ongoing. My PR covered that, but I can move it out to a separate PR.
>>
>>
>>
>
> I don't see a github issue for that.  Can you make one?  If a PR is
> necessary, then, yes, please make PR for just that (many smaller PRs is
> better than one big one).
>
>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Christer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ice mailing list
> Ice@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email