Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not we should meet at IETF 105
Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Thu, 11 July 2019 00:51 UTC
Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9B9120052 for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.204
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YKjOwpQDmNqk for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa34.google.com (mail-vk1-xa34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD76D120024 for <ice@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa34.google.com with SMTP id 9so856282vkw.4 for <ice@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6OQqsclhYbQ9n0fEqIK2XOfjTHSCPZE6mDW9CbXFPkw=; b=NHJbS7hQz+OuvGA/0I3lkmTkaXBXj6k3OICIPFI5MfPmcQvIg51HvoK/8khspNkmaR t61XKz6+3MDWkcLUr+bEbANZqGf2IYz/Kt2OcQm4694GONMcvzGeuIkZ7OpQFMWPe4ii C42v0IfYtGfbnOmwLF+pdfQhVD3q0HrMHIHgB74+OMTFwfYGErNiepGx+7VqMECWLlwn +Klx4uLy79EzWNr6JfQQWaCOuLCuiXiq/3sS3ebsucrdCGBdOK+G+/T4U7WqwznwItHC I4MgIjKjMBFaAXRlEZzSQZ/zPrfw3zWpJyDEub+fZKL1SbtlMHRArVPz1gi/9towGOT3 v6VQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6OQqsclhYbQ9n0fEqIK2XOfjTHSCPZE6mDW9CbXFPkw=; b=uRaGBo3G8qe+eyuWVg9WozI4hkGSt5DlX7uKD3fFoYemPseqvDH15B0xW9CVGc5ZyC J0K6dWgcompYtfhfeAwBGNPocG03kWM4bhBaPU9jNtOMzPM5t+K84kQVJE87RD8W9G8/ Uj4fjnTIb5x3M+HVBy3qdqMvYMqGX6oCAZq1JLS8dncokdL7bxNUA0QQvzoTh7NOeIxG d6dyzfnnNGyH732u4iCz03yCuibNh3L1wlC5f4ZO3Eo5IgHWAdnYNWK0m/0K/7rpGOXc AeeJkZfkB1utEPOFsNKP6t7hskU+oF2HuL7SX3t1s9Nt7CePRerZWULDsGTZW6T5NHWT kBmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUVOLlz6+w8W2qIelG5irvGdwS/CwuLuB/DRmUsuBLxJDuIEWNO IcYgO+gcDgc5mEiW7XIFBba0Iw1FzmQ4pTyqvutqKw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyBtaeDTV1BYQxq/Z0UyNrepS574QYCMTaLe2DeHCWmnmnp4sVefB3kH7ctbRAP7QUmLDONjQ7v+csvwBxJcys=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:180a:: with SMTP id 10mr314492vky.45.1562806305134; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJrXDUGdixUj7EbQg=p7Vi25gik=Ut5fGWAFF8gAGGoUSZJMDg@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB31617368E73EF0DDF489C9C793F10@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR07MB31617368E73EF0DDF489C9C793F10@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:51:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUFUipHR1qyYJTn6TmY=45sT4G3VXkhdTWs-vN4yBceD4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: ICE WG <ice@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ac038e058d5d320b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ice/risJutUSDRtYk0DZX8zI6ym3B3Y>
Subject: Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not we should meet at IETF 105
X-BeenThere: ice@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interactive Connectivity Establishment \(ICE\)" <ice.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ice/>
List-Post: <mailto:ice@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:51:49 -0000
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 12:50 AM Christer Holmberg < christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > >It appears to me that nearly all of the issues with ICE-PAC have been > discussed and reached a conclusion and >solution with the following PRs: > > > > > >https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/15 > > >https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/16 > > >https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/17 > > > > > >Once we merge those PRs, nearly all of the issues of ICE-PAC will be > resolved and we can likely move to WGLC. > > > > I am happy to work with the PRs above. However, unless I’ve missed it, > they do not cover what happens if the timer expires while ICE is still > ongoing. My PR covered that, but I can move it out to a separate PR. > > > I don't see a github issue for that. Can you make one? If a PR is necessary, then, yes, please make PR for just that (many smaller PRs is better than one big one). > Regards, > > > > Christer > > > > > > > > >
- [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not … Peter Thatcher
- Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or … Peter Thatcher
- Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or … Justin Uberti
- Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or … Ari Keränen