Re: [Ice] ICE PAC: When to start the timer waiting for possible peer reflexive candidates? - discussion restart

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Wed, 10 July 2019 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B02120019 for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.593
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.593 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4r68eatEwz1z for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F2212009E for <ice@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id w10so1951727pgj.7 for <ice@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aKxvFbXnCzeWfIwoyaMMC2cE3EU9znhUtjD/aIZ0I8Q=; b=m17qf8v1xcjOlAikliitT+h0Zy9uPXZCZ8pPhVzGu0sEIt25W2stoIE4q4fr/W6cq8 aGZWMFOqYwA0CsHbgzrh2wCzKl1PEC59eH59JCjPFaW10Oz9z+RIpqJ4FOnQC177u/Qq TLOqwbSMEmXzwD356UmBugBrgdzHcdHwm98cbLFWDZUa2yhBqLSWO5thkS0zgFKbzh7D sLjLuj1JexOxwfTIZxkmRfMUJfSdF6BP1P7VvIZDymVuDaTEawh9JhsP1SJLnfx520Ft J6nadmHpQO//QDu/H5PfcstpgvJzL0qUGxI5+6SQeRdKZ6Dy+ap2vTLU4f9euBpfJ3kB CLyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aKxvFbXnCzeWfIwoyaMMC2cE3EU9znhUtjD/aIZ0I8Q=; b=XaoZDGUZwzXtPvhmAoMykYcrutm+2ZsQrjd/Nleulgm1GFj/GXx/g2GnjmvpdmKXDG ofaNol2YdEXgeg+x6s0rE4codihI9NRkZVN45F4tPULSu0HuL3ggW+kVM3UMGDDVZ5Cd w4H/zMj3tKxNBma6HNhoyDlgtEDEqoorD8KuIKAdFsgYec8HF2+HXtV0AvyH/NrAquKs RYQmgv4/eJ1tjGxfHEzAlpToZLg60DfNiOA6tUrr6WDIsf/OEdaa5SmKQ8fqJOIODIz2 fb3nlm6t4lhVm6sR2RWOYS3DY2NUevq2K/I/O9+3sMUCYF4Zx00n2u4NJIL63qeXc38c 43tw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVL+ML1gSnN15vY0hLw3Bw6tMYeOOJ6Yw8DUGXu8vKX+NxdGlMX vPiW/5bR1jJBNrdxsE6GHK3PgUet
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwu3XxDhMiq25VCCdqGYyZbqvH4HuCasqvjeSIWuRvc35U6TwC25TOMoCryKBdcQyO8J1bPjQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:1208:: with SMTP id h8mr802008pgl.377.1562800835025; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-f180.google.com (mail-pf1-f180.google.com. [209.85.210.180]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s11sm3390772pgv.13.2019.07.10.16.20.33 for <ice@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-f180.google.com with SMTP id r1so1786772pfq.12 for <ice@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b00b:: with SMTP id x11mr1039649pjq.120.1562800833414; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AFCE8799-8865-454F-8478-81CE11E9B454@ericsson.com> <1aa5aac7-af59-4e3b-8651-18f6e6431a2d@alvestrand.no> <66678ADA-7C02-4D9D-B9D2-308873BC0125@ericsson.com> <7a829bc0-d066-a3be-b7be-9b39ce799821@alvestrand.no> <CAJrXDUHZJURLvzBYX2MGcMsrFgyOagW5=s1OSXwDmTZpsruD0A@mail.gmail.com> <VI1PR07MB3167F21EF7A1009B8EB9948B93FB0@VI1PR07MB3167.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOJ7v-11EjJK644RCb=nASVu_vwkhOxzj4XY4JUBW+1Fr19yOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-20GcArjJ0K0ECjtM4RHXPgnx=zs15XAYDEcZjaYinYJg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-20GcArjJ0K0ECjtM4RHXPgnx=zs15XAYDEcZjaYinYJg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:20:25 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxsTDArU2u5LBuq-5U3mouadr4Uqm7GN_wd3xmuN2xv2-A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxsTDArU2u5LBuq-5U3mouadr4Uqm7GN_wd3xmuN2xv2-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>, "ice@ietf.org" <ice@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000087cf3a058d5becb0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ice/Wf1kta5qLcAjb9etLKi-Z0KPMv4>
Subject: Re: [Ice] ICE PAC: When to start the timer waiting for possible peer reflexive candidates? - discussion restart
X-BeenThere: ice@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interactive Connectivity Establishment \(ICE\)" <ice.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ice/>
List-Post: <mailto:ice@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:20:38 -0000

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 7:09 PM Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> When writing up this text, I realized there are edge cases where you might
> want to discover prflx candidates even if you didn't send any candidates
> (e.g., you don't send any candidates, you get a single IP from the remote
> side, and when you check it, you get a response back from a different IP).
>
> Ergo, I think we should start the timer as soon as we have local and
> remote ICE credentials, regardless of whether or not we send a candidate.
>

Agreed. This makes perfect sense to me.

_____________
Roman Shpount