Re: [Ice] I submitted and plan to present draft-thatcher-ice-remove-candidate in Berlin

[Peter Thatcher <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Emil Ivov <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Are there any cases where you think this would be useful other than
> abetter connection with a server?
>
>
​Yes: continual gathering (aka continuous nomination) would benefit from
this.​




> If all that is changing is the connection with the server then it sounds
> to me like we should rather come up with a way to update the local side of
> the binding and not bother the remote agent with it.
>

​That would be TURN mobility, or some new equivalent (​
​
​the TURN mobility draft has expired).  That is an option that we'd like to
explore implementing, but it's much more work to standardize, implement,
and deploy (both on client and server).  Whereas this is a simply mechanism
that is quick to standardize, implement, and deply, and it's useful for
other things (as mentioned above).




>
> Emil
>
>
> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016, Peter Thatcher <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> I submitted draft-thatcher-ice-remove-candidate and would like to speak
>> about in my allotted time on the agenda when I will also be speaking about draft-thatcher-ice-network-cost
>> and draft-thatcher-ice-renomination.
>>
>> It's a very simple draft. Basically it says you can "remove" candidates
>> just like trickle-ice allows you to add candidates. You could probably
>> read it in 3 minutes. Please do so:
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thatcher-ice-remove-candidate-00.txt
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Peter (Chair hat off)
>>
>
>
> --
> sent from my mobile
>