IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not we should meet at IETF 105

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 09 July 2019 06:59 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DB912032B for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 23:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57v6Tf_W3j6g for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 23:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr10050.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.1.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09D8C1200F7 for <ice@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 23:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=FL0P7osY1xF9PLWRxrIWkYAxmj4auGvdIVMrvDJO+dwDfoIfIWkrf+RLCC0naONrBl3L7oG6eqPvpHjDfns8seILFymyQhFiSsIVjkrTnfaEXMIvmVhVpl6V9mbGF9Mu95k4TIDNrh/yezkdMI1kUgzzatsNuRBhoe8SxnEC85ovBquhrKujO1YfF9R3PNlsdB27rGMw61NnZj2v8S0SqZx9PnFDjeEUZRfTAv/ZBjatQ9/gWhIC2qHgR+rorj9aI22vjDmy4lmFvDeQil6UOqqhZ/W8KOlx3hNp9Sii2/JB87Mnw6/V/c7pmJSt6C8sjLeQLX/1tm/90hQ6nHnb+g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=W9xaPe/vyerGqxmnyC52XPMW6aW6asmo2Ix6F0orM8Y=; b=lVpbGy3Vy0PIsFzmLMUfJL1FuFf7mFHGJaKxasUTTBVFWncFeEdpfZZpibxe0oA1pBipdt6IL8KS35BWUFYPrbc8drvlHkJeX3qF1VOTgE0gQoanmSfCMYAIK2XcQQPqnh4mn6fbObKkS+5cMDUQalOSA0Yz0K1dShnKzHWINQ3mwDZQUl7qDpFxIi4I7iwMfyuyU8Tmjfev3mjxDog5CTS8HJf71Iz3MNyRHb0+UIAbyqQkyhrciOpg4nSTyJ0YY+cmAEANlAKtPZX3uBuWvIzcIduYUBxWCdal6VZzleVtDnrbS12eLlG3+nuIvx/P+3MKiRzUigTT/AZYhu8kwQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com;dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com;arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=W9xaPe/vyerGqxmnyC52XPMW6aW6asmo2Ix6F0orM8Y=; b=oKjJlg/DEIxKziHBGlvnsX8TW96UyuszylTg5h+O6vWbW2zR+9ioeJBf9HTVIsYsQC/f+55AY7tc2sKTCSGPG9trtb9noNOytwz4FQWOLJe1rfrlV01Y/E/eAx5fCsH5R4OEmOC9xmU5oNZdiA8nnfPTwIIZ/70aB+PMZx52AHo=
Received: from HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.170.245.23) by HE1PR07MB3467.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.170.247.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2073.9; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 06:59:04 +0000
Received: from HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5050:a3a9:be80:cf43]) by HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5050:a3a9:be80:cf43%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2073.008; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 06:59:04 +0000
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, ICE WG <ice@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not we should meet at IETF 105
Thread-Index: AQHVNgwHtdIz4G8YBUebyvbKkLUKVqbB2piw
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 06:59:04 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR07MB3161A9AA72C31B017D6A8A0093F10@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGdixUj7EbQg=p7Vi25gik=Ut5fGWAFF8gAGGoUSZJMDg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUGdixUj7EbQg=p7Vi25gik=Ut5fGWAFF8gAGGoUSZJMDg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=christer.holmberg@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [62.113.190.248]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 638f5e60-c9ae-4995-f09c-08d7043aedee
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:HE1PR07MB3467;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR07MB3467:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR07MB3467A17525FFC67E5D0EAD8193F10@HE1PR07MB3467.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0093C80C01
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(136003)(376002)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(8676002)(81166006)(81156014)(790700001)(6116002)(6506007)(256004)(8936002)(476003)(3846002)(11346002)(446003)(44832011)(486006)(68736007)(76176011)(7696005)(99286004)(606006)(186003)(102836004)(53546011)(25786009)(26005)(9326002)(2906002)(53936002)(316002)(6246003)(9686003)(5660300002)(74316002)(236005)(33656002)(71190400001)(66476007)(86362001)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(7736002)(76116006)(73956011)(66946007)(229853002)(54896002)(55016002)(71200400001)(110136005)(6436002)(52536014)(966005)(6306002)(478600001)(14454004)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR07MB3467; H:HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: fPuiM9Oc9ikTwFXnqfmSYxP7Hz7OkJlRROl6m7PaQNmJMRuow31Ca+ZxrYw48WZ9HXAf3X6J6OxymbhKSJz1NjOr7bzfdTz3q5NN4fEt//FvCGIqP1HuelO2gCx3qFKTQo8EfuSOfKO/6Dtvs4G2LAH6CrXbgfZYpAYfYvrO+sE8IX9PSTMg304fubafj97b40KbK4dXqU2odFOqUX0PkMSkhZskqQvL2axuFFsbglSOZRA9pLUc4Qv5itmefwgv/lZR42WFNVA/aNzIHnUdVSP1HaWb+q4PNmQmuQYB3b9KfXfHj11Uv7QdJHEsEdbL5joNCbjqnAfZ+hxznOIdTuA6BjtfmrEwo21I/9eeZufaDSsSBVvERMDiQefw1NBr8U0y/vUeFmGFT9FGWbm9kivf52BMgPfdpYa85RWd2Ks=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HE1PR07MB3161A9AA72C31B017D6A8A0093F10HE1PR07MB3161eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 638f5e60-c9ae-4995-f09c-08d7043aedee
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jul 2019 06:59:04.0779 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: christer.holmberg@ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB3467
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ice/VTNWMJ05XBUzadMTo_Pjn8tx6Nw>
Subject: Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not we should meet at IETF 105
X-BeenThere: ice@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interactive Connectivity Establishment \(ICE\)" <ice.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ice/>
List-Post: <mailto:ice@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 06:59:11 -0000

Hi,

Just to let you know that me and Justin are still having some off-line “administrative” discussions.
However, it seems like everyone do agree on the technical solution that have been discussed, so at this point I don’t see a need for a f2f meeting in Montreal as far as ICE PAC is concerned.

(BTW, I will not attend the Montreal meeting, but I can participate remotely if needed)

Regards,

Christer

From: Ice <ice-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Peter Thatcher
Sent: 09 July 2019 07:08
To: ICE WG <ice@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not we should meet at IETF 105

It appears to me that nearly all of the issues with ICE-PAC have been discussed and reached a conclusion and solution with the following PRs:

https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/15<https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=1c270be0-40f30e5f-1c274b7b-868f633dbf25-767af764a1251854&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcdh4u%2Fdraft-ice-pac%2Fpull%2F15>
https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/16<https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=40fe0409-1c2a01b6-40fe4492-868f633dbf25-72ffe5ff3c2f646d&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcdh4u%2Fdraft-ice-pac%2Fpull%2F16>
https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/17<https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=a7b7b41d-fb63b1a2-a7b7f486-868f633dbf25-d5fdc3169ee1612c&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcdh4u%2Fdraft-ice-pac%2Fpull%2F17>

Once we merge those PRs, nearly all of the issues of ICE-PAC will be resolved and we can likely move to WGLC.

If so, then we don't have much to discuss in a f2f and we cancel the meeting currently scheduled for IETF 105.


Does anyone see a need for a f2f in Montreal?  So, please say so now.  Otherwise, we will likely cancel it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email