[icnrg] Status from Chairs and actions for the ICNRG participants
"David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net> Sat, 18 January 2020 20:52 UTC
Return-Path: <daveoran@orandom.net>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A550F120024 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:52:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6E6Uk3oMUqW6 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:52:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spark.crystalorb.net (spark.crystalorb.net [IPv6:2607:fca8:1530::c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB6D7120019 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:52:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.15.102] ([IPv6:2601:184:407f:80ce:8435:6ef1:809d:b2c]) (authenticated bits=0) by spark.crystalorb.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id 00IKqJcT000944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:52:21 -0800
From: "David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net>
To: ICNRG <icnrg@irtf.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 15:52:14 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5676)
Message-ID: <86EACC15-4624-4FA0-900A-4B48D0468CF1@orandom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_87CA25DC-DA7A-4374-8EF9-7D5A5671F3F2_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/9YeHu27blwGzb2umlGZeShT0u8E>
Subject: [icnrg] Status from Chairs and actions for the ICNRG participants
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 20:52:27 -0000
First, Happy New Year to everybody! We hope you had a good holiday season and are recharged to help ICNRG move our work forward in 2020. This message serves to give current RG status, request reviews and other actions from you folks, and remind people of our plans for the Vancouver IETF in March. Specific actions we would like from you are in **bold**. As you can see, we’ve got a lot of interesting work ahead of us! ###First, some status updates:### - “Deployment Considerations for Information-Centric Networking (ICN)” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-deployment-guidelines/) is now in the RFC Editor queue for final processing and publication as an Informational RFC. - Both “Research Directions for Using ICN in Disaster Scenarios” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-disaster/) and “Information-Centric Networking (ICN): CCNx and NDN Terminology” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology/) have successfully passed IESG Conflict Review and will be soon going to the RFC editor for publication. The former needs a few editorial updates; the latter has been updated and is in the hands of the IRTF chair to move into final editing. - “Native Deployment of ICN in LTE, 4G Mobile Networks” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g/) has passed RG last call, last call comments have been addressed in the latest version, and it is now in the IRTF chair’s hands to initiate the IRSG Review. - “Architectural Considerations of ICN using Name Resolution Service” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrsarch-considerations/) has passed RG last call and we will be submitting it for IRSG Review in the coming days. - “Design Guidelines for Name Resolution Service in ICN” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements/) has some last call comments that need further consideration and hence we will be issuing a second Last Call on this document in the coming days. - “ICN Adaptation to LowPAN Networks (ICN LoWPAN)” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan/) has gotten wide support and we will be issuing an RG Last Call for it in the coming days. Please look for the last call announcement and **re-review** this important document. ###Second, please take time to review the these active RG documents## We hope to move them forward toward last call if appropriate, in time to discuss in Vancouver. - We recently adopted “Enabling ICN in 3GPP's 5G NextGen Core Architecture” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-5gc-icn/) as an ICNRG working draft. **Please review** so we can discuss moving this forward. - “File-Like ICN Collections (FLIC)” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-flic/) got a major update just prior to the Singapore meeting and urgently needs more review. The authors plan to have an updated draft prior to Vancouver, but **please review the current version** so we can make progress as rapidly as possible. The hope is to be able to issue a last call soon after our Vancouver meeting. ###Third, please take time to review the these active individual contributions and weigh in on whether they should be adopted as ICNRG working drafts.## We hope decide about these in time to discuss in Vancouver. - “Internet Services over ICN in 5G LAN Environments” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trossen-icnrg-internet-icn-5glan/) **needs review**. - “Considerations in the development of a QoS Architecture for CCNx-like ICN protocols” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch/) **needs review**. Also look for a message from Börje or Dirk about the chairs’ proposed next steps for this document. - “Path Steering in CCNx and NDN” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-oran-icnrg-pathsteering/) **needs review and assessment of suitability to adopt as an ICNRG working draft**. - “Maintaining CCNx or NDN flow balance with highly variable data object sizes” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-oran-icnrg-flowbalance/) **needs review and assessment of suitability to adopt as an ICNRG working draft**. - “Flow Classification in Information Centric Networking” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moiseenko-icnrg-flowclass/) **needs review and assessment of suitability to adopt as an ICNRG working draft**. - “QoS Treatments in ICN using Disaggregated Name Components” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-anilj-icnrg-dnc-qos-icn/) **needs review and assessment of suitability to adopt as an ICNRG working draft**. - “ICN Traceroute Protocol Specification” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mastorakis-icnrg-icntraceroute/) and “ICN Ping Protocol Specification” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mastorakis-icnrg-icnping/) has had review, but we **need advice about adoption as RG documents** - “Hop-by-Hop Authentication in Content-Centric Networking/Named Data Networking” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-icnrg-hopauth/) **needs review and assessment of suitability to adopt as an ICNRG working draft**. - “An Alternative Delta Time encoding for CCNx using Interval Time from RFC5497” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv/) **needs review and assessment of suitability to adopt as an ICNRG working draft**. - “Requirements and Challenges for User-level Service Managements of IoT Network by utilizing Artificial Intelligence” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-choi-icnrg-aiot/) **needs initial review**. ###Fourth, we have started planning logistics and agendas for our meetings at IETF 107 in Vancouver, March 21-27.### We plan to have both a regular meeting during the week and an all-day Interim meeting on Saturday. We hope to devote the Interim to a few “hot topics”, and have proposed that these be: — Quality of Service — Measurement and Instrumentation — Enhancements to base CCNx protocols (Manifests, Path Steering, Flow Balance enhancements, reflexive forwarding extensions). So, please **propose agenda items**, and **register for the interim as customary** (by editing the Wiki page at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/irtf/wiki/icnrg) Thanks for not treating this as TL;DR and actually getting to the end!! Your ever-vigilant Chairs, Börje, Dirk and DaveO.
- [icnrg] Status from Chairs and actions for the IC… David R. Oran