[icnrg] Next steps on the 4G/LTE Draft

"David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net> Wed, 07 November 2018 06:51 UTC

Return-Path: <daveoran@orandom.net>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD79C12D4F2 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 22:51:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r6_8hUwmIb11 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 22:51:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spark.crystalorb.net (spark.crystalorb.net [IPv6:2607:fca8:1530::c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14CF5127333 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 22:51:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [31.133.157.240] ([IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:6c70:1c34:89db:3721]) (authenticated bits=0) by spark.crystalorb.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id wA76pUta013673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 22:51:33 -0800
From: "David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net>
To: icnrg <icnrg@irtf.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 13:51:29 +0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.1r5553)
Message-ID: <840FA4F4-2A4F-4DC7-AEE8-8EB3C11396B9@orandom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_8879BAFD-F3BF-4B2D-A226-3F8EB18A5E3B_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/aN6ItBnVsCMNYO-kkzrwJeMJcI0>
Subject: [icnrg] Next steps on the 4G/LTE Draft
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 06:51:40 -0000

At the ICNRG Interim meeting at IETF 103, we got an update status on 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g/

This document is reaching a mature state and the chairs would like to 
get a sense from the RG participants on two questions:

1. Do you think this is ready for an RG last call, and if not, what 
additions/changes you would like to see to move it forward.

2. Do you think the appropriate target for this particular set of work 
is the “Informational” or “Experimental RFC track. It seems to 
fall somewhat in a grey area between the two.

Please reply to the list. We would like to have feedback by the end of 
next week or so (November 17).

Dave, Dirk, & Börje.