Re: [icnrg] Heads up: CCNx specs adoption discussion
Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net> Mon, 19 December 2016 21:06 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@dkutscher.net>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB57112965C for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:06:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cd-iwunh8zts for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:06:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD621295CC for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:05:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Dirks-MBP.home ([95.91.249.105]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue004 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ll1qT-1ctnKD47ZF-00ajgU for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:05:57 +0100
To: icnrg@irtf.org
References: <545320f0-5d61-78f0-c42b-a18ef0eff388@dkutscher.net> <d07b2463-d920-cb1c-4a52-8973a76d0c44@dkutscher.net>
From: Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net>
Message-ID: <b223c596-aa65-a04c-b15e-cae4e94e2ee6@dkutscher.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:05:56 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d07b2463-d920-cb1c-4a52-8973a76d0c44@dkutscher.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8gpjCjDVs65xx7wKr9c0bK1mjiRDTdhKI5m723NJaLujMaNDI2h RvKg87FzzkXD7XN2C4AZtfYQ0btZAG5KckI3N29ff42nZg9XnTjyCNwYHz7rNbHN3GJEvPl ahWA8VMOXXCkaPa5f9Ib7SgpwFMr8zIjHzk+e6GEXzlW7zLeRqH6c90HZiSdUw8VSg922cf EG0uwQBLPqn2CkDhBxJPw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:hGK3sxoAIZM=:0xZZt0evBibDxm8YbjwvuK GQQ46gWBRN0HyRygcPmt6Lwxu4k8TrZ5sUMEHU4xfdyTEXM9Yay9HlRHugcBgwmWJPVY82aTf sWBetlJaqH562oiXoWMsClG2BHvw7NNRB01qsJKl7pSjZ0T9YqTAJreiRYEcrZ54hJaAT0UNe SxevcEFH5Pzxa3UGc4711QXwI+johfRW3bLNaGUZSMH29A7djjz9sc/t8b57fIUmruqtbopvo OwPO0FvbquBu/ssqWQM57VsEk/uJvFH9ega2TnVJkUALUmOuGYOdXj1d7/5Kk8/tU5g6BzmiX UNlbDnDsxCt3Urt4NCB7dT4kN8UhykDia41NpfRc4+DQsf7XIX2rJdpgmDskWXxWs043fiGTA Q44o5UDvf4/50mLAIWgV3ytTz8iTKZ1r65a68cAvWaQfgyrqfb6hU2+TmKEj2Ut2US2o8ks1F 8rKvcZFHLHayHVAzWCxo0ARdqklhnBX0wXZNqeN3Y5oqJZQtp/cQ0C4BVDrHXBwbT25FC/OFX lY4Xm8Tkf+2IslMxtJv83L0KsbrtlpjAIh4dp6mcBoQHsEURmkXUFZiZPAo00TIusbWzHQfqp t5IZa9kCBcBFCQfHaC1hxJUrfIthEvppBAh9v2R3mggymjB1zIu3gJ3zx+WRWyU4bY3vRqjUj Xu25JvvijXHWouRiZGak7QnKPHPQ2s3v3rmMCNGWYzu9+fBtRmC3aeTpjO55oe15AO3pfjxr0 Bb0v0dBDDurPmW5u
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/lAhNPXEyqRVJ2ku5Z_B46mBl4xE>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] Heads up: CCNx specs adoption discussion
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 21:06:01 -0000
Hi all, we'd like to encourage you to share your views on how to move on with these drafts. Thanks, Dirk, Dave, Börje On 09/12/2016 17:18, Dirk Kutscher wrote: > Hi, > > as you have seen, we added the flic specification to this list. > > Any feedback on all of these drafts proposed for adoption is welcome. > > Best regards, > > Dirk, Börje, Dave > > > > On 07/12/2016 21:34, Dirk Kutscher wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> at our meeting in Seoul, we said that we are currently >> feature-freezing the ccnxsemantics and ccnxmessages documents, >> awaiting the outcome of our harmonization effort. >> >> There are however a few other specifications that complement the >> above-mentioned ones and that are relatively mature so that we could >> consider adopting them as RG documents. >> >> The documents are: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wood-icnrg-ccnxkeyexchange/ >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mosko-icnrg-ccnxurischeme/ >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mosko-icnrg-beginendfragment/ >> >> >> The goal for adopting these documents would be to advance them to >> experimental RFC status in ICNRG. >> >> When doing this, the usual conditions apply: >> >> - we'd like to see support for adopting these documents >> >> - we'd like to see some interest in helping to progress these >> documents (for example, by reviewing them) >> >> - if adopted, these change control is transferred to ICNRG, i.e., >> they become group work/research items. >> >> In the following e-mails, I will ask for corresponding feedback for >> adopting each of these three documents individually. Please provide >> your feedback on adopting the documents individually. Any reply is >> welcome. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dirk, Dave, Börje >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> icnrg mailing list >> icnrg@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg > > _______________________________________________ > icnrg mailing list > icnrg@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg
- [icnrg] Heads up: CCNx specs adoption discussion Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [icnrg] Heads up: CCNx specs adoption discuss… Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [icnrg] Heads up: CCNx specs adoption discuss… Dirk Kutscher