IETF Logo Mail Archive

[icnrg] Heads up: CCNx specs adoption discussion

Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net> Wed, 07 December 2016 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@dkutscher.net>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969DD12967C for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:34:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nteIRg22yhHK for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:34:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC324129B1B for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Dirks-MBP.home ([95.91.249.254]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue005 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MWfMN-1c8ptA2mqp-00XvVV for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 21:34:27 +0100
To: icnrg@irtf.org
From: Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net>
Message-ID: <545320f0-5d61-78f0-c42b-a18ef0eff388@dkutscher.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 21:34:26 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:CNBy0eiBXggBVy+L1YrODSmHqsWm/OQhcuBMp4j9qavZ6F/WJup w5dB/V2biPryh1/ApRNkE4eivmgSvGSxJYsNepQhXcUKOxTSh/gS0QzjOH/NcaGj1x7Xaxd TGjep0XvdIR6iRhJJlTFj/+OtVEIGwIxwWovvZgIWmRtE7tvxaW4Z++8CzsAvnZQ4XGGexq +eJIqtXBp9lCN08W9LMZg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:WwpX8CMUM+o=:y0z2YJIR+RiF5hjQbUCQmK /AxadkY03oUYMjDYn+G9iE85z/i/CynBRE2VdIqcKmnPSGKqeJL8bGM6q29a5YAESS0EMCy1K rxHrn8D9jENXYfCW8Mg/feZ+IUGWuAV6MpX25FNHukNLZv5aoj8ouRjWJfz73B5cxtuSPKnc9 +RxFkZBeUhZwNYh9hgoTpcCKmqfBRFrmuv5BPLWnzhfK0XVdrCHzN6tppts73XPViCyKYT34A 69mCdmZlWc+cPWKMkDSXc+Wr73TbBuVgxGY3hi3n9rhj68k40lJ83gk03gyW5hlpRKSOS9rWf DjhOdILDN7Dmw87S2/2IJnqAG8/SmiN/0Ei/ckD4h4szbelLryZbigkV3Rgwuq/K7IwhG0+XP xdBKXv78w9O9Ux+4cZacDIGhjnnkj2qVjZv9b0JvmF7jTQy/QNBvsrZoJxnLBH5bcfou4Kfao HgC4v/0HrYz7Lvqh+PEK65krBWtmut6v+E2C4VV0nlUWdzD9Jw69XSRuHnluTinXeEPyvGeZd BJKf/PvK2pFHVexM5ekERs9Ne4dNJxInc/fMOLyfD0l8CHNpQ/z/5mNDS0EAnDEDfNhHD5Wda 1GfR0YrRrT9zv2OHtLYSBaFPY7DQvjFiKUEw72Sbnfrj6np1qx4cLJmjFHc3G2fKp01PT2FAD z9eiJjL1H/xoQiTrgjtUF+N/JPCrC5IWi0FsrKkXMf/946EKioVp4G8CqTC4eSJZB7WVtekcN kMxO1rvl7wD+pGNv
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/wcJ6CnMnHeNGfCB5PcpKn0asxuQ>
Subject: [icnrg] Heads up: CCNx specs adoption discussion
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 20:34:31 -0000

Hi all,

at our meeting in Seoul, we said that we are currently feature-freezing 
the ccnxsemantics and ccnxmessages documents, awaiting the outcome of 
our harmonization effort.

There are however a few other specifications that complement the 
above-mentioned ones and that are relatively mature so that we could 
consider adopting them as RG documents.

The documents are:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wood-icnrg-ccnxkeyexchange/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mosko-icnrg-ccnxurischeme/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mosko-icnrg-beginendfragment/


The goal for adopting these documents would be to advance them to 
experimental RFC status in ICNRG.

When doing this, the usual conditions apply:

- we'd like to see support for adopting these documents

- we'd like to see some interest in helping to progress these documents 
(for example, by reviewing them)

- if adopted, these change control is transferred to ICNRG, i.e., they 
become group work/research items.

In the following e-mails, I will ask for corresponding feedback for 
adopting each of these three documents individually. Please provide your 
feedback on adopting the documents individually. Any reply is welcome.


Thanks,

Dirk, Dave, Börje

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email