Re: [icnrg] next stepd for draft-zhang-icnrg-icniot-requirements

Tyty

On Aug 8, 2016 11:32 PM, "Dirk Kutscher" <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> at the Berlin meeting, we concluded that we’d use the mailing list to
> agree on next steps for draft-zhang-icnrg-icniot-requirements [1].
>
>
>
> In case you don’t remember, this draft is the result of a merger of
> draft-zhang-iot-icn-challenges-02 [2] and draft-lindgren-icnrg-efficientiot-03
> [3], focusing on the scenario, requirements and challenges aspects of both
> input drafts.
>
>
>
> After the merger, the authors have submitted another version, reflecting
> some community feedback.
>
>
>
> Please see https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/slides/slides-
> 96-icnrg-3.pdf for a summary of the genesis and the current content.
>
>
>
> The chairs would like to get an understanding whether the ICNRG has an
> interest in pursuing this draft as a RG activity (“adoption”). We normally
> do this for drafts where there is a critical mass of interested people that
> would like to see this progressing within ICNRG and eventually be published
> as an (in this case, Informational)  RFC. This would also require a
> critical mass of people that would be interested to spend cycles for
> reviewing the draft and future revisions.
>
>
>
> Could you please let us know whether you think this draft a) should be
> adopted as a RG item and b) whether you’d be able to help reviewing it?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Börje, Dave, Dirk (ICNRG chairs)
>
>
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-icnrg-icniot-
> requirements/
>
> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-iot-icn-challenges-02
>
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lindgren-icnrg-efficientiot/03/
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> icnrg mailing list
> icnrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg
>
>