IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Id-event] [EXTERNAL] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-11: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Thu, 25 June 2020 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: id-event@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: id-event@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA513A0B83; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MROr9KIKMsnZ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8A43A0B81; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id k6so5386015ili.6; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c9z0Td5L86qtpU5DNqygfgk4F1126gGEMWgxSo2eXQM=; b=F5B7bzY8vuZn0o+C1rsUnbU3iR/D86qiZhGbEZYOnzuOWUxsLgOboK4Qwkh7ggGBqU 5j5AVF3xbwhDhHgD9ss/+CQrAbo+XclhSozhCDTB6ZenAQ8L4W6FfYgGG3F7DUQZGOcj BAOi6QvQ193lpk6PIf5ZAVan1YUITh/f6UkAxZizVOPC5dI8HJoiuQQguDIwfB33+aBC UZLPi+iAxGMB9ZrQMRe1LsqhjLVl0OImHjfPD0GpQzTjc/BBjxGxR4TcM7I01j/gVGIa Vwn7G8aflbIMGpLFaD1JdnBIygGVPiHMAOOUiHy25kaA/tqj7mQUhyI/ZnGdKO8fQMoF fHLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c9z0Td5L86qtpU5DNqygfgk4F1126gGEMWgxSo2eXQM=; b=K5sVB2rO+D009hBIC19+rMdLjt9FGdX6OPDzTzAaEvyTBx0CcTcXR5liQwRC3aJtvw yV4lvKj8I1zdCjRvgWe9m6ZkABhhWTp6v8TkKfLTwr/Tvh1Vve6hR33RUeE6s9sOoVP5 SDs/L8rb29qpjWql0z23MikA5l1hBrXZ2L4XpYyOIukaOzKrXStzXPbvaRej/usDODvg Yw+SRlCBZs+8I5P3akUkoIfWEeENY4EhIt/zBbXhGldfz7+oOtJjQsCEoav4cz1gy2jp PE/vOfCF/xpdmQkY5vRXmd7IL6OQ422rRS5/7OY28yoYWx89rZilg2A0M4dMFnqilWoC x2yg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530W0oaWhEwtUpdlIw1s9Y+Zi6XLvoybg1vipZ4rk8R2nBpH8+iT C6pGVbaEV3hFCk1Iib9bQJqcHuKzCPLD2oYtpSY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFB7AkZjGp5nyPml+n9Sxh/sy0gC4MLQiHlYOoGDnrW91w5L+FdTm5+LltLheQuNnq9ho+rtpFq42e257ZsTo=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d64d:: with SMTP id x13mr27405874ilp.287.1593094102758; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159262402813.23018.718129073957411259@ietfa.amsl.com> <CH2PR00MB06780F5DF3100C4D0ED6194CF5920@CH2PR00MB0678.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH2PR00MB06780F5DF3100C4D0ED6194CF5920@CH2PR00MB0678.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:08:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxRKumEVV6wMd1wso6QGn1i-kh4x_+T2s7CVZzH7CunUhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll@ietf.org>, "secevent-chairs@ietf.org" <secevent-chairs@ietf.org>, "id-event@ietf.org" <id-event@ietf.org>, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000016be3805a8e92086"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/id-event/ABQUunRR3eTu6cj495NDpnEwD5M>
Subject: Re: [Id-event] [EXTERNAL] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: id-event@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A mailing list to discuss the potential solution for a common identity event messaging format and distribution system." <id-event.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/id-event>, <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/id-event/>
List-Post: <mailto:id-event@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/id-event>, <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:08:25 -0000

Thank you.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 9:31 PM Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for your review, Martin.  This is done in
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-12.
>
>                                 Thanks again,
>                                 -- Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 8:34 PM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll@ietf.org; secevent-chairs@ietf.org;
> id-event@ietf.org; Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>;
> yaronf.ietf@gmail.com
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Martin Duke's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-11: (with COMMENT)
>
> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please add an informative reference to RFC7519 on first use of “jti”.
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email