IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Id-event] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-secevent-token-02

Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com> Tue, 24 October 2017 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <bkaduk@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: id-event@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: id-event@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C0313F6D0 for <id-event@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 07:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c9MVRNOos1t4 for <id-event@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 07:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B092013F6CA for <id-event@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 07:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9ODw3if010952; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:01:30 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type; s=jan2016.eng; bh=E0AR9nyZP+Cgb/w9Cn8quPEubWrPjV8TVCCsouAKpao=; b=EAIWn/EtZVPTez9oFnBCKl9c5XokEUgVTFj+jGJhcw/KHvWQJFIBXb4BLIxaUuHhX3+R m8LDy1fiknRx38eoMmOehKKS5BaV0gXltxAFu937VPq7Yrff0X4OONWLxq4qEvFFfqyj KVf3TMbam5Yfe1yOae6/axee1oP8iYvMR8iRny6OVcKjEtiq081+UwPl66eVN8x2mX3y VrHFOW06xJ1XYNXFE6pUK5iJ67H8BO2JUs2Z6qfaHwAccxS+YJ9p+NzE7lUTMymmgsZD qMq/MHQ1Muj+4wqvrHqMPjOmkxMn9jQjqfHlZww8LE+HO5FVpYDzjnpRyQ3TkgTgZQ1G eA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 ([96.6.114.87]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2dqwgkt9fd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:01:29 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9OE0TAl023290; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:01:28 -0400
Received: from prod-mail-relay15.akamai.com ([172.27.17.40]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2dr1jwtmku-1; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:01:28 -0400
Received: from [172.19.17.86] (bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.19.17.86]) by prod-mail-relay15.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129D420066; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 08:01:27 -0600 (MDT)
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: SecEvent <id-event@ietf.org>
References: <e6649728-f94a-93f5-9885-c948a5b0ed49@gmail.com> <CAGdjJpJtfV9q2iaL-uao1b7XpQjx5uJrX=fnoM36POXLFYrqow@mail.gmail.com> <CY4PR21MB05044FEC88C9019A9E9BD146F5470@CY4PR21MB0504.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
From: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>
Message-ID: <a1396655-fc13-b7e2-f6bd-69be1ea37ebb@akamai.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:01:27 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR21MB05044FEC88C9019A9E9BD146F5470@CY4PR21MB0504.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------643922634522843C3A6ECB0F"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-24_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710240197
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-24_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710240197
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/id-event/Xgig7dBG-SZeNf8zgU_qxU1hnO4>
Subject: Re: [Id-event] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-secevent-token-02
X-BeenThere: id-event@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A mailing list to discuss the potential solution for a common identity event messaging format and distribution system." <id-event.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/id-event>, <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/id-event/>
List-Post: <mailto:id-event@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/id-event>, <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:01:41 -0000

On 10/23/2017 07:05 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
>
> Figure 5. Maybe a signed example would be better, especially that the
> next paragraph mentions that signatures or encryption should be used.
>
>  
>
> Unsigned keeps the draft shorter. ;-)
>
>  
>

That justification sounds like a joke, especially with the smiley.

In-document examples are used to give guidance to the reader, including
implicit guidance; I would strongly prefer for there to be examples that
actually describe the desired/expected common deployment scenario, to
subtly reiterate the expected case.

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email