Re: [Ideas] IDEAS Charter

+1

Thanks Padma for the hard work!

Albert

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:43 PM, <christian.jacquenet@orange.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Thanks again to Padma for the editing effort. I too support this charter.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Christian.
>
>
>
> *De :* Ideas [mailto:ideas-bounces@ietf.org] *De la part de* Padma
> Pillay-Esnault
> *En**voyé :* samedi 2 septembre 2017 03:55
> *À :* ideas@ietf.org
> *Objet :* [Ideas] IDEAS Charter
>
>
>
> Dear IDEAS
>
>
>
> The final outcome of the discussions on the alias is reflected in the text
> below. This version is based on the edits done by Alvaro, some of the
> latest comments and fixing some nits.
>
>
>
> Thank you all for your feedback and comments.
>
>
>
> Looking forward to the next milestone
>
>
>
> Padma
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> IDEAS: “IDentity EnAbled networkS”
>
>
>
> Network solutions based on the concept of Identifier-Locator separation
> are increasingly considered to support mobility, overlay networking for
> virtualization and multi-homing across heterogeneous access networks.
> Identifier-locator separation protocols require infrastructure that allows
> nodes to discover the network topological location(s) of its peer(s) for
> packet delivery. A common infrastructure and protocol could be used by
> identifier/locator protocols as well as network virtualization. However,
> additional infrastructure and new protocol extensions are needed to address
> new requirements that go well beyond the traditional discovery service and
> mapping of identifier-to-location for packet delivery. Identifier-locator
> protocols are also useful for additional services involving dynamic
> association of a name to a set of network addresses - these include dynamic
> multicast, cloud service anycast and context-aware IoT queries.
>
>
>
> The IDEAS WG is chartered to produce a framework document that defines the
> expected behavior of a mapping system across the multiple existing use
> cases.  The framework will aim at a homogeneous behavior across use cases,
> and it will call out specific trade-offs that may be considered in the
> development of solutions.  We refer to the framework providing the set of
> services as Generic Identity Services (GRIDS).
>
>
>
> Some of the areas that should be considered when developing the framework
> include:
>
>
>
> - Flexibility and extensibility considerations
>
>
>
> - Description of interfaces for different protocols to interact with the
> framework (e.g. id-loc split protocols, management protocols, etc)
>
>
>
> - Requirements for identifier/locator mapping resolution and mapping
> update (e.g. discovery, pub/sub, multi-homing, ...)
>
>
>
> - Registration and lifecycle management of identities and their associated
> identifiers.
>
>
>
> - Identity authentication and authorization (e.g. access to framework,
> update of information for identifiers..)
>
>
>
> - Description of required basic network policies and policy enforcement
> needs (e.g. ability to look up an identifier-locator pair, permit
> forwarding traffic for particular endpoints on a per-identity basis…)
>
>
>
> - Analysis of the concepts of identity-identifier split and dynamic
> identifier changes, including their implications on anonymity and privacy.
>
>
>
>
>
> The IDEAS WG will closely collaborate with LISP and HIP WGs. The WG will
> also collaborate with other WG as needed.
>
>
>
> WG deliverables include:
>
>
>
> (1) Generic Identity Services Framework
>
>
>
> (2) Other WG sustaining/informational documents may include:
>
>
>
> These documents may not necessarily be published, but may be maintained in
> a draft form or on a collaborative Working Group wiki to support the
> efforts of the Working Group and help new comers:
>
>
>
> - Problem statement
>
>
>
> - Use cases
>
>
>
> - Requirements for identifier/locator mapping and resolution
>
>
>
> - Requirements for identity authentication and authorization service (for
> GRIDS).
>
>
>
> - Applications of the architecture for use cases
>
>
>
> - Threat model document
>
>
>
>
>
> Milestones
>
>
>
> January 2018 Adopt WG draft for the Generic Identity Services framework
>
>
>
> July 2018 WGLC for the Generic Identity Services framework
>
>
>
> September 2018 Send Generic Identity Services framework draft to the IESG
>
>
>
> November 2018 Recharter
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ideas mailing list
> Ideas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas
>
>