[Ideas] Ben Campbell's Abstain on charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 12 October 2017 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048AD134320; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 20:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, ideas-chairs@ietf.org, ideas@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.63.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150777857299.16865.11417955671778590032.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 20:22:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/YCMc1pyUrWThefAmY9eDwUOeZ1g>
Subject: [Ideas] Ben Campbell's Abstain on charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 03:22:53 -0000

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: Abstain

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


I agree with the comments that this should have further discussion about
privacy. An additional BLOCK on that point doesn't seen necessary.

I agree with Spencer that we don't seem to be talking about _this_ charter
anymore. I think that ideally we should withdraw this from consideration, and
readdress it with a new charter proposal. So I'm ABSTAINing.