IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ideas] draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement and "Common Infrastructure"

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 05 July 2017 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3D513208D for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SLnrodugZnyc for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x231.google.com (mail-wr0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5157913208B for <ideas@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 77so263756786wrb.1 for <ideas@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 07:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2nhDopJVYllRw7IbiDFhPXQlbJtJkUgwpCdgHG6Fmxo=; b=kLOTZFPQYgLO6NbPIOn4Z9+EPJcbCwBZgU9p/6HPOoZSaa0VNjAP1unEKu1iznmrjR bJOwRdanZqcHJiOD9U+Q9RepZAg8E5HNmyh26MCgXZdirR0NOqjCJalE5Nik84iTe8DF 9tq3OLfGYWVgLyXL8Bfam3pFldL4j1VtB+IL+S2fk3wyPBmL7QBSWtCpMpxO5jRue+1i B6Qu/m95MONowxKb8IhZimU4i4GoFDDkolgWBftwAL2jLFxJkCJ0QkQTvxYDlWTVmXqb PZGQOilGSUWNfHyCUk7KM8g4Ruy1tvD95L1498gXjWVilm+/WcPifNfDfRq7pIEaEYUh r0kQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2nhDopJVYllRw7IbiDFhPXQlbJtJkUgwpCdgHG6Fmxo=; b=tmM4XthW6rIm0oIj2jZVx/NPr1tGr0I/Fr3vraTQ99Dlurt0o7vgQEU1pn+tvG3CYU h/Cq+p3lXfWY9nZ1LMe0Hgk9zildOdUr9j8FMioRIb95fzJpnlimtBPLiBvVnD5q+2XM h0Qd9G/GMUdKH8SGMGo0kIaza+Zzb/rbN3lkO3HGOWLnzgXmL0C/xynVfMDMqVeKPY+J nGPo25aQOGQ66ULjNNwQVVrikZ0jI+WPv2Mvz5n5f7VzplGWlfXA9nlwvXJ/E1UqrS9r 5JxafEMGTIoYdYCdeH4/mzqVbgrjT4sxqVCJMzJMwtIR8MXHvrFN+ZRTMZKa4NgHZNng oFnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwXmk6IwEkl7zlMYYmC9Dds0+JSbRSesq6za5eG0olSsX7pSvf9 sViWIwgLCzRyZoDvGPNNF1m75JtC7g==
X-Received: by 10.223.151.44 with SMTP id r41mr38399186wrb.6.1499263530832; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 07:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.170.152 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9084360a-160e-944a-96aa-0b33379ccdb8@htt-consult.com>
References: <9084360a-160e-944a-96aa-0b33379ccdb8@htt-consult.com>
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:05:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FK7AJA4vvKG9oT+EwRVJkGWU7iiw62jCpLykxJeqeuGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
Cc: ideas@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f576e2e1d4a0553927e7f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/lIgWz_YLaomOygv_QIlq035LATs>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement and "Common Infrastructure"
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 14:05:35 -0000

Bob!

Brian and I had chatted briefly about charter direction and we wanted to
hear some of the discussions during the session. And that's what they pay
us the big bucks for!

But I have to agree with your plan of attack.  If we could give some
guidance:

- work on the problem statement and gap analysis but don't invest larger
cycles of time on them.

- requirements are good to capture, but we will shy away from turning them
into published documents as they will change over time

- some discussion on LDAP is very necessary as the code base has gotten
quite mature.

tim

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
wrote:

> Disclaimer:  I had a hand in edits to this version, though I am not listed
> in the Ack section.  In particular I pushed for "Common Infrastructure",
> not "Common Control Plane".
>
>
> We have been talking a lot about Identity and Identifier and metadata.
> One of the tasks of this workgroup (and charter item) needs to be data
> modeling of what is intended to be stored/available.
>
> Further there needs to be Yet Another Gap Analysis (YAGA?  :) ) on why NOT
> LDAP or some other mature xyz data store access protocol.  I start with
> LDAP as there is actually a fit, and the various server implementations are
> very mature with good, secure, backends and data replication tools.
>
> It is time to start thinking charter.  The problem statement, gap
> analysis, and use cases is barely a start.  What the group is going to DO
> is focus now.
>
> So I propose two work items:
>
> Common Infrastructure data modeling (and someone other than me can do it
> in YANG).
> Common Infrastructure protocol requirements with a subsection on LDAP
> comparision.
>
> Bob
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ideas mailing list
> Ideas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email