Re: TAP/RFC931 support for Smail 3.1.26

Stephen D Crocker <crocker@tis.com> Fri, 28 August 1992 14:23 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02489; 28 Aug 92 10:23 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02485; 28 Aug 92 10:23 EDT
Received: from ietf.NRI.Reston.Va.US by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07637; 28 Aug 92 10:25 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02454; 28 Aug 92 10:23 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02450; 28 Aug 92 10:22 EDT
Received: from TIS.COM by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07589; 28 Aug 92 10:24 EDT
Received: from TIS.COM by TIS.COM (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA27151; Fri, 28 Aug 92 10:22:44 EDT
Message-Id: <9208281422.AA27151@TIS.COM>
To: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
Cc: rfc931-users@kramden.acf.nyu.edu, ident@NRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: TAP/RFC931 support for Smail 3.1.26
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 28 Aug 92 10:20:00 -0400. <m0mO7Bu-0003TdC@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 10:22:43 -0400
From: Stephen D Crocker <crocker@tis.com>

>> Thanks!  I see that the patch for smail uses libauth.  This will work
>> OK with identd?

I don't know.   Anyone else have a comment?

Steve