IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt

Vint Cerf <vint@google.com> Wed, 06 January 2010 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <vint@google.com>
X-Original-To: idna-update@alvestrand.no
Delivered-To: idna-update@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6EA39E255; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:09:56 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sKQgz31JhCIf; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:09:55 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.6.8
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.6.8
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38C1939E165; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:09:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.76]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o06EAISW007016; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:10:19 -0800
Received: from bwz22 (bwz22.prod.google.com [10.188.26.22]) by spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o06EAHLD011837; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:10:17 -0800
Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so13418229bwz.25 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:10:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.24.15 with SMTP id t15mr422486bkb.113.1262787016901; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:10:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 207-105-81-117.ded.pacbell.net ([207.105.81.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm6127691bwz.12.2010.01.06.06.10.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:10:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <27FE3E2D-B0C6-4166-8AAC-1CF5EED74FF5@google.com>
From: Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <4B449721.5040800@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:10:11 -0500
References: <200910052014.n95KEaw08697@birdie.sybase.com> <9FA605F57343CEF5EFABE247@PST.JCK.COM> <E98EDF5B-8AB4-4828-B4FE-2C7F9D5B9642@google.com> <7244A8D31696F4C508337CDF@PST.JCK.COM> <0A140D60-175C-4C0A-A9F8-61149443DE60@google.com> <4ACB0A60.5000608@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <9D15BAAF-8A34-43DC-9D1D-31EC0FFEA574@google.com> <E273732873CBDA2E83A98E88@PST.JCK.COM> <4B449721.5040800@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: idna-update@alvestrand.no, "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, Kenneth Whistler <kenw@sybase.com>, erikv@google.com
X-BeenThere: idna-update@alvestrand.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IDNA update work <idna-update.alvestrand.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@alvestrand.no?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@alvestrand.no>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@alvestrand.no?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@alvestrand.no?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:09:56 -0000

looks good to me.

On Jan 6, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:

>>
> I am now integrating changes suggested during Last Call review so  
> that a new version can be emitted as soon as the IESG says "no other  
> issues".
>
> In response to this issue, I have added the following statement to  
> the introduction:
>
> The other normative documents in the IDNA2008 document
> set establish criteria for valid labels, including listing the  
> permitted
> characters. This document establishes
> additional validity criteria for labels in scripts normally written
> from right to left.
>
> I think that's what the document was saying all along, but it  
> doesn't hurt to be over-explicit, especially given the reactions to  
> "CS" that we've seen on the list.
>
> Is that clear enough?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email