Re: [Idr] draft--‐previdi-idr-segment-‐routing-te--‐policy-question

"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Mon, 11 April 2016 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A0012EDC6 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fBps8e1mVMLC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B82512ED94 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1800; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1460378846; x=1461588446; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=O03cq4nfnp7JlDa0U+LoPAzoGO6RArv8SaPiEorPT6U=; b=hjUpK8YlVtZdbSySj5nNaNgAY5cm081I6o9QNFHxk1oSiT+2GUKk4m1u lukDGyo69KdKmaObu7wC4VQg1ZGxEpVI9+QtiXH64p281XPWVbglBE6oY Uh+Tl73IwSSoD2rCNacqXOTBWeZoxHH5JGk0OZdM6lUCPcfzipTs4Baxf 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A7AgBXnAtX/40NJK1dgzdTfQa2J4QuAQ2BchcKhWwCHIEOOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeEQQEBAQIBAQEBASAROgsQAgEIEQMBAgECAiYCAgIlCxUFAwgCBAENBYgfCA6sJJFpAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQR8hSWBdYJWhD2DAiuCKwWNToo2AY4Ljw2PJQEeAQFCg2dsAYksfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,462,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="258433841"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Apr 2016 12:47:10 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3BClAp4025698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:47:10 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:47:09 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) by XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:47:09 -0400
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft--‐previdi-idr-segment-‐routing-te--‐policy-question
Thread-Index: AQHRk/BCK+sySq9JQ06tLIR27K4TXQ==
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:47:09 +0000
Message-ID: <31C1B23D-1B2B-4BAF-A9F2-E5E61287BC7B@cisco.com>
References: <011501d18f49$dd55d730$98018590$@ndzh.com> <D32A7567.58100%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D32A7567.58100%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.228.89.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <04699020F0DA7E4AB8186B62897DCDE1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/-JtTlfQGWQY_Ewc0gc_xlDsF2wI>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft--‐previdi-idr-segment-‐routing-te--‐policy-question
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:47:33 -0000

On Apr 6, 2016, at 1:16 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sue, 
> 
> From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
> Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 at 10:45 AM
> To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Idr] draft--‐previdi-idr-segment-‐routing-te--‐policy-question
> 
> Stefano: 
>  
> Would you answer how your team states “Advertising a TE policy is new in BGP” when we adopted
> draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-02?  (see slide 11 of your presentation)
> 
> The draft you reference (covered on slide 7 of https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/slides/slides-95-idr-14.pdf) doesn’t doesn’t deal with TE polices. It simply extends BGP Link-State to include IGP TE Link Metric Extensions (see RFC 7474). 


correct. 

. draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-02 (I admit, this is a poor name) is in fact a bgpls extension
. draft-previdi-idr-segment-routing-te-policy it’s a new BGP SAFI/NLRI for advertising SR TE Policies.


thanks.
s.



> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  This draft has to be an improvement or different than the accepted work to be considered within IDR.  
>  
> Sue Hares
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr