IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft--‐previdi-idr-segment-‐routing-te--‐policy-question

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 06 April 2016 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9AA12D68B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 04:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HBCj5HjH4o4 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 04:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE5E612D7D6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 04:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7535; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1459941402; x=1461151002; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=zkfxWiMDLHLx3qckggBtvXQbvYelRYOTC07cnjUstX0=; b=LU7MJP2ajWHcTcEeSadER5jF+xLTq7hdT1RI4StlUiemvTmgXEFyWjuh n84kozRCDqyY911MGZujED1gd58qEsAMYgrZw4osapA6MwTjmyI8pqo1j GjlH6Rp2SY3dh4YO6Dfc1dKBL81vKQwsF7W3j0BBrTqYiIvFNSB8rK4aN 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AcAgCL7wRX/5FdJa1cgmtMU30GtVhFhC4BDYFyIYVsAhyBJjgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEEBAQECAiMKXAIBCA4DAwECKAMCAgIwFAYDCAEBBAESiCcOrmiRewEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAREEimyEX4JgglYFmAEBjgqPDo8gAR4BAUKDZ2wBh3R+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,447,1454976000"; d="scan'208,217";a="256254507"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Apr 2016 11:16:41 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (xch-rtp-014.cisco.com [64.101.220.154]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u36BGfOC008732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:16:41 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 07:16:40 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 07:16:40 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft--‐previdi-idr-segment-‐routing-te--‐policy-question
Thread-Index: AdGPSdThKoLO8jj2QKOMBEqS3AaSuAAtFUkA
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:16:40 +0000
Message-ID: <D32A7567.58100%acee@cisco.com>
References: <011501d18f49$dd55d730$98018590$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <011501d18f49$dd55d730$98018590$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.87.121]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D32A756758100aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/l48fsSnKMEzjnwRFyNSc8cze_4Q>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft--‐previdi-idr-segment-‐routing-te--‐policy-question
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:16:46 -0000

Hi Sue,

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 at 10:45 AM
To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Idr] draft--‐previdi-idr-segment-‐routing-te--‐policy-question

Stefano:

Would you answer how your team states “Advertising a TE policy is new in BGP” when we adopted
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-02?  (see slide 11 of your presentation)

The draft you reference (covered on slide 7 of https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/slides/slides-95-idr-14.pdf) doesn’t doesn’t deal with TE polices. It simply extends BGP Link-State to include IGP TE Link Metric Extensions (see RFC 7474).

Thanks,
Acee




 This draft has to be an improvement or different than the accepted work to be considered within IDR.

Sue Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email