IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities-07 - BGP Community Container

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Mon, 11 July 2022 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FF7C184B33 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJdnZXCjkKXw for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BADE3C1527B7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id t1so7577094lft.8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bC39i3aYG0ORjy6f+vmcCVDCONQUWC8QP1Rg12mSq4s=; b=c/3luzNkO7SC51XNaXcGFEd50YTFGzLg+R8RVpemV6BF9cLcL+B2UPB8fXqAqGHhWC 8P/ba+EN2cW5ZbuwaG4UXmVTHB2jGbWUJFiaTF0NKlFLVhi6c+8gu9FuI3sy/2kHjY28 jDMa8CZu8Za+RuNMnQHdiuKse0RzgmdGFefYCp2JBIltVjF63PF+mawRzekcI3GY8+NO Dw1M7kpx9qBo+o58P20hjP9eB/eE2aEJw4mv+7PSspWWwIsgiUxL5nsF4j17Y0heq9Y+ pRfG9ybboj7rVIugFpCLENxWNXmqjiArwoi2wVkNcskEl0WvLEmYfnDSlmwhpM2l3H5K oIOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bC39i3aYG0ORjy6f+vmcCVDCONQUWC8QP1Rg12mSq4s=; b=ucriJDaqPbgu25Y2fSErxeJBoBkTPdP6EJ9L97MdDIQGviNv35rg+76xTy8UvQUldQ amTqqHyVCHmByFVhbqp/DJZm/Fa+aar58Sa+XIi7/oKzhGovFwmEJYVqvpuaq3T8mq28 X69aXQwn+MHVgIi9/nY299k8m7BVDEvMwdrx+CtO4p68NmTWqSqCMkpICNpUfBSoXgD2 lZrkVbUaY+ThKEXN6p4BkqMopZAIfg1ykHu9lRth2guSu9pMscB5JHRm/XcHYBy9TM1/ tM5tvjQ/ZQM+/J6brai923aPKd/41xuoOJCUOdjImrbzE8xuMUFXpqAYtvZdIKHeOSJX DwZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9zTs1tElirhd/QwchyjjvrHWxrv8QxduArII7KCSdi2qg1JZoo T6Vv07AJaNT7lBsIsch8wkrNpTXPI3qooDkIommcZw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vhN8IgZA67Seuel6Ix+NyaPIDBIOey3i8mgcIzxKFtnhT7o0m2RcN/qkAWDgS2Yhwwmk7BvwCz+Fy4Gj2Jqu4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:e9b:b0:489:e034:cfc9 with SMTP id bi27-20020a0565120e9b00b00489e034cfc9mr3945083lfb.366.1657580582018; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <31784442-7A03-46E2-B255-7D7FF46FD88F@cisco.com> <20220708195701.GB29763@pfrc.org> <E109F29A-8701-443E-BCFA-14A370E6B736@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMGXCZ674h=XuF0AqV4o0n+-wBVzfpLuihGcQh7VOktaew@mail.gmail.com> <E094DB91-02E5-4C33-82EB-CB3995521589@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMExYuXfPAjkZkgdTFPPfuMNPxFXtO0inUgZKZetCzbU=g@mail.gmail.com> <52B1B5E4-ABF6-40DC-8BD4-875A613B8068@cisco.com> <8826B995-4044-4706-9165-2A10C6271315@pfrc.org> <B2F48483-F7B7-4FD0-A423-66FFA94B761E@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMFnTq5PYqgjncS7LfiQAceF3Cry7UTMtK5jK_hYpV137Q@mail.gmail.com> <5987EC71-2972-4F5A-AC43-30F844DAC315@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5987EC71-2972-4F5A-AC43-30F844DAC315@cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 01:02:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGqK_udrtC4+Gk0c2mjG43RDJwCv6P=bJy1chxG78WLPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities@ietf.org>, IDR List <idr@ietf.org>, Routing Directorate <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c7386705e38f8d52"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/-lFKcNXZMr3dVq_kaOqUhpTIcY0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities-07 - BGP Community Container
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:03:07 -0000

Hi Acee,


> Yes – so a wide community known by the receiving speaker with an
> unknown/undefined atom for that community will be treated the same as an
> unknown wide community. Is that right?
>

In the context of 4.4.2 yes. For 4.4.1 as we discussed no. So yes or no
depending on the sub-type.

   The U-bit indicates how the LSA should be handled by a router that
>
>    does not recognize the LSA's function code.  Its values are:
>

But isn't this directly comparable to the notion of transitiveness of
attributes in BGP ?

Many thx,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email