IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Summary of IDR Draft action items from IDR meeting

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 21 July 2017 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A6912EB2B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 02:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sKr5tHolj7hQ for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 02:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E431A129AA0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 02:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=31.133.153.78;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
References: <007501d301fb$a4caf5a0$ee60e0e0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <007501d301fb$a4caf5a0$ee60e0e0$@ndzh.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 05:00:42 -0400
Message-ID: <001201d301ff$d5f30c40$81d924c0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01D301DE.4EE2CBD0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJKrhvU8dNCUEvqmLf569eqoaFLFaFuoM5g
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/-zXkoVSwUXjiDPdWSoN5CAwI6wA>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Summary of IDR Draft action items from IDR meeting
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:06:47 -0000

Hi all:

 

John indicated that I did not clearly specify what I meant by a 

 

"People are interested in an interim that discusses linking BGP to a link
later" 

 

This is a typo - another one of my famous and funny typos. What I should
have typed was: 

 

"People are interest in an interim that discusses drafts that provide a link
between BGP and the link layer such as the LLDP draft
(draft-acee-idr-lldp-peer-discovery-01) or the draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd draft."

 

Sue Hares

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 4:31 AM
To: 'idr wg'
Subject: [Idr] Summary of IDR Draft action items from IDR meeting

 

IDR WG: 

 

Please review this list of WG LCs and adoptions.  Did I miss anyone? Or did
you want to ask and forget to?  Send me a note if you want to be on one of
these lists. 

 

Sue Haers 

 

WG LC was requested for: 

1)      draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-04

2)      draft-ietf-tunnel-encaps

3)      draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection 

 

WG LC soon was requested by other groups at this IETF ro: 

1)      draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages  

2)      drat-ietf-idr-ls-trill

 

Indication that quick transition from WG Adoption to WG LC 

1)      draft-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd 

 

Request for WG Adoption call: 

1)      draft-li-idr-congestion-status 

2)      draft-li-idr-flowspec-populate-to-fib-01

3)      draft-acee-idr-lldp-peer-discovery

 

People are interested in an interim that discusses linking BGP to a link
later. 

Target time:  Early September

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email