IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Summary of IDR Draft action items from IDR meeting

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Fri, 21 July 2017 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFCA13157A for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 04:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KjzTOMDO_kNE for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 04:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0A46131667 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 04:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id w191so11872899wmw.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 04:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5QP8WHomX2ID/kyx7WoYk6ck6FsKpnx3K9oMCpknifk=; b=rud7SG9v47XEGZQVJyILKrqvGwa49SAlRWx5wAWJxa2RRt+vmWKuebpC4WWFtNXhxa XH8rxjs5XRqPt24IzjbkBbBItvMmG6BL5llLCkBtRn/J9eLXshIx5xqTwWz8meHK1f4G S+AuxEAKe8131ryFZ/PQHs0ct8motaitzlCfkzqHNY/3/keUgJCQJaXO6zhcIukbs5ed vL4+pZ16DmdKI0f8unj20w81oDASTt9pk7nbZ4TpM/UTOdCqai9YuGO2RhaKQqxHB2oM VYvHeOj09ZBS+qoSByAJgCIMgWEPtgpqX8VeNVqXB2FoYZV0fES97SXN5O8/DgBc05z0 Ge9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5QP8WHomX2ID/kyx7WoYk6ck6FsKpnx3K9oMCpknifk=; b=bqQ4q12HosT+rJKwDmcl+b+UCybXWeHNbMRbOan3mIqTgeLsds5fpbQwDpHtOASroS gXqRCnTX4xZ6YQSABuDPUtgh+dFjXe3WIEc4rR+VOPXPZiDbw2Xr63Kn9IzSTr2OZHnV UyTZI4tfQxvC0W92N/gSAw4Rr3ZO0FRq3TQcFGQssMIZP89M+YdGuZmh+zfmL1ziP3+X MJZ7jj5jy0FdZ28yK0uZ/PGzyaB7BbpQT3wYLQKRykE4P96Hb1Svm0aD8z2b+Xxkap7v wKhLkN3NZdmZIV8XBAUi1aX5fS/TjsoXTIw6VJykKw/8hnYxGmpeT4wKbdGypBaqD3Ij vL2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111LUUvRMbiGqhn82i7Jaqf0kAqlHmdE+PqkKW2kcLkqxjOq6cYW 0X8j4wWDjQCW99sHgjYu88CVWt44sMlMbAE=
X-Received: by 10.80.213.72 with SMTP id f8mr5655523edj.69.1500637839448; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 04:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.138.99 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 04:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <007501d301fb$a4caf5a0$ee60e0e0$@ndzh.com>
References: <007501d301fb$a4caf5a0$ee60e0e0$@ndzh.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 13:49:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hOna0GUAY-VLwn69oTKiXxSUOcq51sVtgwbRJZ94FgciA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045dbcec5b60fa0554d2796a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/pFjx2Tv3M6lYmsl2CIENvlXKcdY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Summary of IDR Draft action items from IDR meeting
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:50:44 -0000

Probably an oversight.

Following draft was also requested by authors for adoption

4) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-idr-bgp-route-refresh-options/

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> IDR WG:
>
>
>
> Please review this list of WG LCs and adoptions.  Did I miss anyone? Or
> did you want to ask and forget to?  Send me a note if you want to be on one
> of these lists.
>
>
>
> Sue Haers
>
>
>
> WG LC was requested for:
>
> 1)      draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-04
>
> 2)      draft-ietf-tunnel-encaps
>
> 3)      draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection
>
>
>
> WG LC soon was requested by other groups at this IETF ro:
>
> 1)      draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages
>
> 2)      drat-ietf-idr-ls-trill
>
>
>
> Indication that quick transition from WG Adoption to WG LC
>
> 1)      draft-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd
>
>
>
> Request for WG Adoption call:
>
> 1)      draft-li-idr-congestion-status
>
> 2)      draft-li-idr-flowspec-populate-to-fib-01
>
> 3)      draft-acee-idr-lldp-peer-discovery
>
>
>
> People are interested in an interim that discusses linking BGP to a link
> later.
>
> Target time:  Early September
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
>


-- 
*We’ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
that is not true.*
—Robert Wilensky

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email