IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Query on draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-15

Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com> Mon, 20 November 2017 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8504A129BC5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:45:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jAhfbAeBppSC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:45:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22d.google.com (mail-io0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D06FD129B29 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:45:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id h205so15636631iof.5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:45:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uJqZP4+JEbFTlKZSw9i95DvmTZesTDYED420xLx3WGM=; b=JUy+MWKN8oj9QWMLE/iZwvJ5+chqbBuhMvCCeReKDahtjbX94UAwex+zEWUhNgLVdW UTY0x7WvfoSySH8V8Fz666dxwTqaImIb7GiOBgg4TNsx9RzB+S9nZvNtPRT7OCmSFlRC y4d/OoIEGS3O96iOFEAcP3baOC6E5Vnzlz4AF6ytmKEG7mP2Oqgq9Xi+muJthL/YffIE ZpVHcNohmVvPFljRCQNd/IN7lY9vV6golEtzqARqkR1qghu7wD/g9WYeaXrchXUUEiJA zMpTQbUWIAsvm4nW/6gh/eN1tDcbgJRGAfR03rmSVduioZ8SFAZCLNVJrK4BXz+eUNJG tnPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uJqZP4+JEbFTlKZSw9i95DvmTZesTDYED420xLx3WGM=; b=maBO7Aom/J2gMB1fWyyey2PmLpjKxeUMXOwf9pFXVnSoBnJfQ/tCsSj/5YxMkg41Su bnf7vNfSpBWmmlG2eW3jiStIMRGrDhWPceq/X2gA2ZirIQQwM90UGr+wlTF+yLH6EolU cuN7sgr5uyruv0fNcGP5+DGAp8YnJJDYsvOLEE+c4P3kqma5ejMK2vM7b/ijq0E8Tk8g OjhQG1OtDevJyasOwLi54xIXwQPBvUT/iXsxvyeJybpIfZ7DBi1smmkn8aK/wpszvuKh flFkt7sJX+E1wwlwtwna4A7M2CHdA6/kuX2PyU+pAhm7pLcE7ppPBZEext6fKP2KJy90 pU9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7ngb7tUm1ucq0J/lmAYXib4hX0kzLvZBkm0o513SoglNHGFVRZ neYw1gr007ga2Jc+F8I6B3VkHgo/fhWuJXRyJIk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZbAcRz8qOH8nwrGyAplgZ+N41lZrgaP2I4cWVB9zZLXXMt+cpiKqyjt/Ej2PFN0YyWppenhFGcV4eTq6d5x88=
X-Received: by 10.107.36.17 with SMTP id k17mr1602830iok.176.1511196334990; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:45:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.134.37 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:45:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D6385A04.DA762%acee@cisco.com>
References: <CAKz0y8yesGQrmmLNm4rJL_=W53tr-Kp2OpgqR_q9qkp3rPa2gQ@mail.gmail.com> <D6385A04.DA762%acee@cisco.com>
From: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 22:15:34 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKz0y8x0oMPQ7030kGft44j5-XhGoRhCKpUoDVjUf-shg3y=oQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11403450bbaa08055e6cd059"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/2-0nIRMyx8FBcxR208mmgabtC5w>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Query on draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-15
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:45:37 -0000

The IESG statement is about standards-based approaches to configuration,
right? There are deployed SNMP based systems for monitoring that are
crucial for network operation. What is our recommendation towards them?

Regards,
Muthu

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi Muthu,
>
> The IETF has moved on from SNMP-based management to YANG, refer to this
> IESG statement:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/writable-mib-module.html
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <
> muthu.arul@gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, November 20, 2017 at 9:19 AM
> To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Idr] Query on draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-15
>
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2 is supposed to address some of the key
> deficiencies in the BGP-4 MIB [RFC4273] including the ability to monitor
> IPv6 BGP peering sessions and carry IPv6 reachability.
>
> However, that draft expired in 2014. Does anyone know why it didn't
> progress further? Is there any other draft or RFC replacing it?
>
> Regards,
> Muthu
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email