Re: [Idr] Query on draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-15

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 20 November 2017 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C11129ADE for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 07:14:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L78DFIlTut7L for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 07:14:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39899129AC1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 07:14:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5803; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1511190842; x=1512400442; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=uouEqwjE1DGUIrkh0P4EaSSsYNuS2ASEA1Wzh3CYiko=; b=l6LlhCsx2cXrf3mYSpFZTwuDU7GPAgPu9JayGMBTDx6HfFzkjUa61AMA sYDOVIQ5PJzXIpQYCr88dhh5CGq2B95xwsAWnoWGdj++4mChiSxyjAZ33 5FYAw9dUHDdWyUs1WAzJqQPFgfygeVUeyeQsr9Va/nfENw6o6qPRVR9QC 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DYAAB98BJa/4wNJK1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJKcmZuJweDeIofjyiBfYhciD2FSYIRCiOFGAIahGU/GAEBAQEBAQEBAWsohR4BAQEBAyNmAgEIEQMBAigDAgICHxEUCQgCBAESiUFMAxUQqFyCJ4czDYM1AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARoFgzSCB4M+gyuCa4JQgnWCYwWKLYk5jhs9ApARhHmTTI0siFkCERkBgTkBHzmBWxl6FUmCZIReAXcBijeBFAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.44,427,1505779200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="33408224"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Nov 2017 15:14:01 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAKFE1HO013171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:14:01 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:14:00 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:14:00 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Query on draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-15
Thread-Index: AQHTYgqaPU73EXVN2U2vsPMt+Jaef6MdYEKA
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:14:00 +0000
Message-ID: <D6385A04.DA762%acee@cisco.com>
References: <CAKz0y8yesGQrmmLNm4rJL_=W53tr-Kp2OpgqR_q9qkp3rPa2gQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKz0y8yesGQrmmLNm4rJL_=W53tr-Kp2OpgqR_q9qkp3rPa2gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D6385A04DA762aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/5Qy1vxrG7R9xnpw6DQlo-4sNpZY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Query on draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-15
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:14:24 -0000

Hi Muthu,

The IETF has moved on from SNMP-based management to YANG, refer to this IESG statement:

https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/writable-mib-module.html

Thanks,
Acee

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com<mailto:muthu.arul@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, November 20, 2017 at 9:19 AM
To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Idr] Query on draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-15

draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2 is supposed to address some of the key deficiencies in the BGP-4 MIB [RFC4273] including the ability to monitor IPv6 BGP peering sessions and carry IPv6 reachability.

However, that draft expired in 2014. Does anyone know why it didn't progress further? Is there any other draft or RFC replacing it?

Regards,
Muthu