Re: [Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-08: (with COMMENT)

[Job Snijders <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 08:04:39AM -0700, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-08: No Objection
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I wondering why there is this addition cited below to the copyright
> notice needed given there is no IPR declared. Can you please explain?!
> „This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
>    Contributions published or made publicly available before November
>    10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
>    material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
>    modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
>    Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
>    the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
>    outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
>    not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
>    it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
>    than English.“

The document updates the technology defined in rfc4486, and the
idnits thingy gave this feedback:

Miscellaneous warnings:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (Using the creation date from RFC4486, updated by this document, for
     RFC5378 checks: 2006-01-25)

  -- The document seems to contain a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, and may
     have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008.  The
     disclaimer is necessary when there are original authors that you have
     been unable to contact, or if some do not wish to grant the BCP78 rights
     to the IETF Trust.  If you are able to get all authors (current and
     original) to grant those rights, you can and should remove the
     disclaimer; otherwise, the disclaimer is needed and you can ignore this
     comment. (See the Legal Provisions document at
     http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more information.)

	source: https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-08.txt
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Without the disclaimer for pre-5378 the idnits tool gives this feedback:
https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-01.txt

I am open to any suggestions if change is needed, I do not consider
myself a copyright expert.

Kind regards,

Job