Re: [Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-08: (with COMMENT)

["Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <[e-mail]>]

Ah, thanks. Wasn’t aware of this. I’m neither a copyright expert. Did you try to contact the authors of RFC4486 rather than adding this note?

Mirja


> Am 22.05.2017 um 17:11 schrieb Job Snijders <[e-mail]>:
> 
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 08:04:39AM -0700, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
>> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-08: No Objection
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> I wondering why there is this addition cited below to the copyright
>> notice needed given there is no IPR declared. Can you please explain?!
>> „This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
>>   Contributions published or made publicly available before November
>>   10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
>>   material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
>>   modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
>>   Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
>>   the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
>>   outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
>>   not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
>>   it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
>>   than English.“
> 
> The document updates the technology defined in rfc4486, and the
> idnits thingy gave this feedback:
> 
> Miscellaneous warnings:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>    (Using the creation date from RFC4486, updated by this document, for
>     RFC5378 checks: 2006-01-25)
> 
>  -- The document seems to contain a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, and may
>     have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008.  The
>     disclaimer is necessary when there are original authors that you have
>     been unable to contact, or if some do not wish to grant the BCP78 rights
>     to the IETF Trust.  If you are able to get all authors (current and
>     original) to grant those rights, you can and should remove the
>     disclaimer; otherwise, the disclaimer is needed and you can ignore this
>     comment. (See the Legal Provisions document at
>     http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more information.)
> 
> 	source: https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-08.txt
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Without the disclaimer for pre-5378 the idnits tool gives this feedback:
> https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-01.txt
> 
> I am open to any suggestions if change is needed, I do not consider
> myself a copyright expert.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Job
>