Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 being WGLC'd in sidr
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 21 September 2012 05:59 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AFC21F861A for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P7kwDcBDIPoz for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1310.opentransfer.com (mail1310.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A795B21F8619 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 27807 invoked by uid 399); 21 Sep 2012 06:00:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.6.80?) (pbs:robert@raszuk.net@64.134.239.181) by mail1310.opentransfer.com with ESMTPM; 21 Sep 2012 06:00:10 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 64.134.239.181
Message-ID: <505C0228.40805@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:59:04 +0200
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F706AF@CMA-MB003.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <D7AC4E75-4B51-4F60-8B41-9B8EB3AEA3ED@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <D7AC4E75-4B51-4F60-8B41-9B8EB3AEA3ED@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "idr@ietf.org List" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 being WGLC'd in sidr
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:59:08 -0000
Hi John, The proposal of dropping AS_PATH and the intention to completely replace it with AS_SEC_PATH attribute has been negatively commented so many times in the past both on idr and sidr that by bringing just one thread below seems like erasing all other comments. The issues are not only related to routing .. they are also related to number of BGP monitoring stations deployed today which use AS_PATH attribute for real time BGP analysis. Do you expect all of those tools to change/be updated when IETF will publish path validation RFC ? To only bring few past comments: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04693.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04695.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04701.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04721.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04722.html Regards, R. > Folks, > > FYI draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 being WGLC'd in sidr. This > draft, assuming it progresses, represents a significant update to the > BGP protocol, notably in terms of AS_PATH handling. If you haven't > looked at it already, please consider taking the time to do so. > > Comments should go to both the sidr@ietf.org and idr@ietf.org mailing > lists. > > There has already been some discussion of the draft on the sidr > mailing list. Archives are here > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg05062.html > > --John > > P.S.: If you intend to review it but need more time, please speak up, > and say how much more time you will need. > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> Subject: [sidr] >> WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 Date: September 15, >> 2012 7:45:13 AM EDT To: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org> >> >> This starts a working group last call for >> draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05. The draft is available at >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 and >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol/ >> >> Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for >> publication. Send end comments to the list. >> >> The WGLC will end on 29 September 2012. >> >> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair >> _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list >> sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr > >
- [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 being WG… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 bein… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 bein… Neil J. McRae
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 bein… Danny McPherson
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 bein… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 bein… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 bein… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 bein… Jakob Heitz
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 bein… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 bein… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 bein… Danny McPherson