IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: (with COMMENT)

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Mon, 09 November 2020 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2D03A0D7D; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 01:19:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tix.at
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bXs63TjGJ6JM; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 01:19:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.fbsd.host (mail.fbsd.host [IPv6:2001:858:58::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 165FB3A0D58; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 01:19:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tix.at; s=rev1; h=References:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type :Message-Id:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=l2jsCYeoAVkwriVnhIcjzMQv44xxzILAMPA9Ssj1eZY=; b=FBjfVbOer+XN4NRYbp2gizASUA swywU2NJj22M1miZkxjCddApOOT+06sl9syAJ1IWmzEguha1UkKOg4TmHFU60NKJtamEsczNEy71W rjUJ6jF4lRVdqXaHJVfBunpDh4KRm9NJ/KL6CwSitHbqzgUwZchMRMUB67er8rq9gDp6UBJS5Aztf rvklfVCdiPw7QUbjAUTO2MFojpHpqWGOkXFoE78kmqGUBRHvU4xpn9MQKMKSqWYwWdVwAsCwhTAvu 2i62Q4gaoc97dhUdt0ozGuQ8099xnsTZTQbh5skWEORtcjM5oxUWj0PZ62+jVf/yu+yojAPpfObey zt+a8OKA==;
Received: from 80-110-113-91.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at ([80.110.113.91] helo=[192.168.64.148]) by mail.fbsd.host with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1kc3KT-000Nxb-1A; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:19:13 +0100
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
Message-Id: <3C5351D9-534E-49D5-9DBE-C70645BC34C9@tix.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4AE993F2-EA32-4045-AF6B-F6ECCFE3DF57"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:19:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: <160455692644.2516.13632701884902451356@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, idr-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <160455692644.2516.13632701884902451356@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-Scanned-By: primary on mail.fbsd.host (78.142.178.22); Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:19:13 +0100
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/65tKHdeWph8tTEDG5LE6t5is-xk>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 09:19:21 -0000

Hi Eric,

Thanks for your review. I edited the document accordingly. However, it will take some more time until we can publish a new revision because we collect all the changes.

Cheers Christoph.

-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at



> On 05.11.2020, at 07:15, Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> [[ discuss ]]
> 
> [ general ]
> 
> * I agree with existing discuss points raised.
> 
> 
> [[ comments ]]
> 
> [ section 3.8,{1,2} ]
> 
> * Per RFC 5952 section 4.3, s/upper hex/lower hex/g for IPv6 address strings.
> 
> 
> [[ nits ]]
> 
> [ appendix A ]
> 
> * s/non of/none of/, I think
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email