Re: [Idr] Regd BGP-LS code points early allocation for WG adopted drafts

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 15 July 2017 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA286129B26; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKzubXyl7ZkN; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com (mail-wm0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 243A61276AF; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id j85so15434851wmj.0; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=dD42KFZ2INoQC/xn+5KD7NEkwC/nBdMIeaD8WKEir+w=; b=n9zwHIQIMOzm23byXgj3fo/z7AKMw/DNMIQMZaVg50MoH55G6ATB02jMmSgKT/gN9a rg034cy5iVUc8MHvFtrdUQAA1omhzR4u3wc7Pze2LpGXpjzapW2fB46dyvDavmIhZqLN ppGWOTZtCq+NlTkxwkADU/LlpR2sEnRbqNHwRbPJvQ6nLys74ZM5F7lw4St6yjvDioA/ bT+TYt997YxnhcUR3LI0GhfpZRrRaBOfdft16e4MEbPHT/7cuErFTSyBHjC8FNODs9Oq AaOht/3zxy4CoJnDzaNWEMwC5vCUZsEr+N49nZWv4V+QEELoaNav5/fSz9Dq8lsifHs2 5tkQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=dD42KFZ2INoQC/xn+5KD7NEkwC/nBdMIeaD8WKEir+w=; b=qAV+ydNs/YMe/5bMLbfy10sZ9FNNF0kCCC/92CNK6SHeNHy1Cv/NUnN5L2vZAPZ549 8gks6sVaQtez3A+CTjTQ+XL/eb5R7FwdeoBc6vAw30VrHmiYPpwEj3Hfd6GB+4PLHX0O pGd1RMfEmHWhCyWx7Q+fFQJoHY6j0D83KjSIUpaLmo3LLGU0QFQoNKknm0s6j2l8zcRQ SzEG4w0KDog7bSCSXYEAB8sLjqRKn0jbAWil+PGuYGsz6V+Xi0A9930/r7Hq+W6usuXU whz7NbPp9XgB2DVu58i33PhbV/uqruUXixsIundFLGZ59WZxCjSkWUszUxXJ0IAI4qeG 6tVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1109/bWqMitLFLalT7aB3pyoa+ACXekqOFL9rIoiPuYqXEXMKJxk aqkIOBXWh01Kng==
X-Received: by 10.28.11.134 with SMTP id 128mr1314577wml.79.1500128257713; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.150.241] (dhcp-96f1.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.150.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b195sm11741813wmf.0.2017.07.15.07.17.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.24.0.170702
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 16:17:36 +0200
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
CC: Stefano Previdi <stefano@previdi.net>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <37805F15-E265-4C37-B491-2BCBABD29D2D@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Regd BGP-LS code points early allocation for WG adopted drafts
References: <999f002984de432bb168f60309d66b63@XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com> <EAC48055-71DF-4DC2-841C-D4C6C0102276@juniper.net> <7DCAAFA1-1E14-4374-834B-4E6FB174ACFE@gmail.com> <CACWOCC8f=h5Zu_Cf2WE0KGz5RnHXSZuuB-6K-4UL0c7_XCbeuQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACWOCC8f=h5Zu_Cf2WE0KGz5RnHXSZuuB-6K-4UL0c7_XCbeuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3582980256_1421760731"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/7QlD-w9O41DYEfnqoioTEu4r4Go>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Regd BGP-LS code points early allocation for WG adopted drafts
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:17:41 -0000

That’s the plan!

 

Cheers,

Jeff

 

 

From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Date: Saturday, July 15, 2017 at 16:15
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
Cc: Stefano Previdi <stefano@previdi.net>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Regd BGP-LS code points early allocation for WG adopted drafts

 

 

On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 at 15:35, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

Would  you want the authors of draft-tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd  to remove suggested values or wait for early allocation and replace?

 

 

The outcome of the IANA Early Allocation process is not directly connected to self-assigning (squatting) in the current document. I would suggest the squatted codepoint should be removed at the earliest opportunity (Monday morning). Uploading new drafts is cheap and easy after all. 

 

Kind regards,

 

Job