IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Regd BGP-LS code points early allocation for WG adopted drafts

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 15 July 2017 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2976131B68; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 06:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l1bBozfJ3TGf; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 06:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x244.google.com (mail-wr0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E64C8131B5B; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 06:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x244.google.com with SMTP id z81so95867wrc.0; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 06:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bcADbcygGC8og/+SHuUvIurNV8JhKdDj42rfwXarLtE=; b=szTVTvQMzmgTJIxiqoSAMzez4D0gLOv4MyiOixn3zAQyrPg+z5JO6HsMUkfNXM8koF m2J7crUGISjHw3shfhXz0ff3NobvV3hnB8WSqwgzfiHAZiGzWdDcOToh5Fqbxh5Y6kfD S5FcBlvkR6+jWg6sNjfNEcTcM17eixny5VYT46uaHl1CpjXp5yamwPsaqFi6OwfnbyyI 7Wu1D2/C31vKbIRRd7u+asafyOHVtdp5xbIlNbp59DPkq4ZIa4MNO1t56c/+RB8qLbaw 1AjbfcA1XqbH8rMrCM5139vEvDYE85W6JW3qKtx69YcLih9ErcaJx+hmEFu/iL5ZUxPM jWzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bcADbcygGC8og/+SHuUvIurNV8JhKdDj42rfwXarLtE=; b=CgY/8dwPr6QHcWQPCRaBbHIBXB5ThDPe77bv2VZYbvGttkbAV3P1Q0ONmdExet/n5P o1OKPGDLADTfA3Vqb6Zw/ejTMYm+vMYw1x6te1AJQvJRzRQJWO6Haukf93yw+OJ1YYVC KW1xuNBzoiQCf8i4S/7psJBtXZnYpBjhjJcftOSa26tGjTiPiWoma9PnHWKLtvTMXfn7 djAPLEZWtN8cHrkvM/R18VDOZWhOuG8/G8dFFEq6vjsFUYH0ywraCQOGyvMOHlAT4QQh XaZLHiUaFrJaJk2wVx2vcbLhwIvYPOeA0C0cG6JD2lpvwT0EbSzs/MfnF6E87UINW3QV zc0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110NcGFJdCLWkfqOqMWjzTSssTP9pKB5YDtRDlxYKzXTlLtn/9hM i7EdSaFpSOfjpekc4Ec=
X-Received: by 10.223.160.174 with SMTP id m43mr6724660wrm.194.1500125748436; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 06:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.150.241] ([2001:67c:1232:144:61e1:5115:fb36:80a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 32sm13720721wry.31.2017.07.15.06.35.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 15 Jul 2017 06:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.24.0.170702
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 15:35:45 +0200
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
CC: Stefano Previdi <stefano@previdi.net>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <7DCAAFA1-1E14-4374-834B-4E6FB174ACFE@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Regd BGP-LS code points early allocation for WG adopted drafts
References: <999f002984de432bb168f60309d66b63@XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com> <EAC48055-71DF-4DC2-841C-D4C6C0102276@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <EAC48055-71DF-4DC2-841C-D4C6C0102276@juniper.net>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/qZel06aU0ZSL_OSrHcanoAmFsAY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Regd BGP-LS code points early allocation for WG adopted drafts
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 13:35:51 -0000

John,

Would you want the authors of draft-tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd  to remove suggested values or wait for early allocation and replace?
Thanks!
 
Cheers,
Jeff
 

On 7/15/17, 15:10, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:

    On Jul 13, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant@cisco.com> wrote:
    > 
    > May I request the authors of the draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext and draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp and WG chairs to please request for early allocation of their IANA code points?
    
    Thanks. Will start a discussion on this shortly.
     
    > Also, the link MSD codepoint in draft-tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd collides with the suggested codepoints in draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp. Early allocations for WG adopted drafts would help avoid collisions.
    
    Thanks for pointing this out (and also to Jie who pointed out similar.) This is also why IDR WG guidelines are to NOT put any "suggested" code points in WG drafts or drafts targeted to become WG drafts. :-(
     
    > Jeff, may I suggest to request the code point 1111 for the Link MSD since the TE PM draft is already a WG item and there may be implementations out there already?
    
    Better still, please refrain from putting "suggested" code points in drafts at all, and let IANA do their work. As you say, early allocation is the right way to handle this.
    
    --John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email