IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IPR Call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-srv6

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Tue, 03 March 2020 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34BB3A252E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:21:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ILfsmT94HujG for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hated.at (mail.hated.at [IPv6:2001:858:2:8::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCAC63A2528 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 80-110-104-164.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at ([80.110.104.164] helo=[192.168.66.207]) by mail.hated.at with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1j9CAg-00049Z-JL; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 19:21:35 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
In-Reply-To: <000701d5eb18$71a02200$54e06600$@ndzh.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 19:21:33 +0100
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <42324907-F484-46F9-B9C1-DB4446B72789@tix.at>
References: <000701d5eb18$71a02200$54e06600$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/7cstygffUDxr5LzwY_DmB218vr4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR Call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-srv6
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 18:21:42 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR related to the draft.

Cheers 

Christoph 

-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at



> On 24.02.2020, at 14:43, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> Greetings: 
>  
> This begins a IPR call for /raft-li-idr-flowspec-srv6-02.txt.  The adoption call will begin after all authors have responded to this email with an IPR statement.  For the authors who have responded before, you will need to respond to this email message as well.  
>  
> A bit thanks to the authors who have waited patiently for the IDR chairs.  
>  
> For the WG general discussion on IDR flow specification,  this call is to inquiry if this draft’s approach is useful.   As has been discussed on the list, the IETF 107 IDR working group meeting will need to decide if all additions to flow specification should go into  a version 2 specification.   
>  
> In order to have a fruitful discussion regarding the amount of additions for flow specification, we will be calling for the WG to discuss any potential Flow specification drafts. 
>  
> Cheers, Sue 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email