IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IPR Call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-srv6

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Mon, 24 February 2020 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718CD3A0B8E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 05:55:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z5uENlggAqVu for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 05:55:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1913A0B78 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 05:55:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id 59so8706461otp.12 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 05:55:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nr36eDEKE7/gwVkDFdOvSSc//MwYwmdYXSqziMF+xxA=; b=Ij0o+3Uba8nHdj28XoEx2eLnZ8EZOwleB9Z6zn92b76WCdesDUZDc/LYSv84WxJx/q kx+Rw0g8Uwb03HVD/GNAy0gCerPkj3RS3nsZB8Pu5dwhmmTKfx5flaHZcE3/znHqwj59 DPSrWE9fk/Cg5TlZ7V+bt8cIIGLGJBzRlQb2VM6djL/+2BTEDpcNOoy1HijqOJo9a5vl I/nLKiRcEqGjjEKIuxaQctIr5Te1ubJrCPENvmFdgFxNba378HnfGDdOW99BMKwIrCS8 Tz/m5JqxG0slk/IlbNTr30HuE6s9pIKj+5nQ8uvF6tE7OIUKAMvw3Go3/+KBzLhqhsMT pX+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nr36eDEKE7/gwVkDFdOvSSc//MwYwmdYXSqziMF+xxA=; b=EZdVakTARC4FoQ3WAQPq/UKcJvxvZRGlURqESOwJtF8xW3LqhqJHmSoNpR15iEzlDI +cEkJZ89VviFc8P5O5BTNppuNdP7xJIrKpAMISTGuobiilopz5fXbbw9kKyaoicJPDtm a6E88MSPIRQUTHdzgriW1JWb9afLyR4kAM4epMkNoMCXERgY5DCRR2jgPh7B7UHiWhzd pa1cwKKJohvDWEPeiMyBym7oIfrtuukuAGJ+gbV+1Vl3wsy9/CogOnVhN7srnP2kw+L6 O2NgnckAN3D0y4n2z3+DyfLxlpxD97FDlHmEaDgC7yv/dsXu9oyWXhrYz/xh+axd0NTt u4Mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXo8CSEoc3d+IXUUworGNu/B7GXyyxuJE54U8kyAdyY8srM45Gl 7HmU5+KuobBKiPuxuUMnjQphaKlWDgh+3lynfB7GPbi6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxgOwKNyiI/efiTosr+8tS1YAnUbNE9jSsUprpfOYyiuXC3HspFc4npCqi0XpEgTh6cIOzFN8bBIXXKdiBnkMs=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7083:: with SMTP id l3mr38275333otj.193.1582552516695; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 05:55:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <000701d5eb18$71a02200$54e06600$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <000701d5eb18$71a02200$54e06600$@ndzh.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:55:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGQxtv9NYWzeJGg4s_C66PoGbcU-bufQ=aeOaLRjw0-Ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000098a8f7059f52b87f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/CRVHQ_NC5DkZLW0UCCu56a_Z1n8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR Call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-srv6
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 13:55:20 -0000

Hi,

I think there is an agreement in place to hold any further flow spec
extensions till Flow Spec v2 (with new SAFI) base spec will be at least a
WG document.

Based on the above I recommend to wait with the adoption call till the
draft is able to reference Flow Spec v2 or perhaps directly be used on its
day one input.

Thx,
R.

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:44 PM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> Greetings:
>
>
>
> This begins a IPR call for /raft-li-idr-flowspec-srv6-02.txt.  The
> adoption call will begin after all authors have responded to this email
> with an IPR statement.  For the authors who have responded before, you will
> need to respond to this email message as well.
>
>
>
> A bit thanks to the authors who have waited patiently for the IDR chairs.
>
>
>
> For the WG general discussion on IDR flow specification,  this call is to
> inquiry if this draft’s approach is useful.   As has been discussed on the
> list, the IETF 107 IDR working group meeting will need to decide if all
> additions to flow specification should go into  a version 2
> specification.
>
>
>
> In order to have a fruitful discussion regarding the amount of additions
> for flow specification, we will be calling for the WG to discuss any
> potential Flow specification drafts.
>
>
>
> Cheers, Sue
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email