Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 2022?
Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 07 January 2022 16:25 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F20D3A0B45 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 08:25:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5jYES_IGqw9Q for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 08:25:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 894473A0B44 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 08:25:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.89.79;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Acee Lindem (acee)'" <acee@cisco.com>, 'Jeffrey Haas' <jhaas@pfrc.org>, idr@ietf.org
References: <20220106172239.GA7969@pfrc.org> <D60F0264-290D-4CA6-A288-2B82B9A97AE4@cisco.com> <002101d803e1$d94e1e50$8bea5af0$@ndzh.com> <3A724034-E5A2-4B66-8D05-55734962EB9C@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A724034-E5A2-4B66-8D05-55734962EB9C@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 11:25:16 -0500
Message-ID: <002301d803e3$29c426d0$7d4c7470$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHVPyDHREkU8L/rmJ8qnBq7wq87PQHuR4YfAWQvEJMB80y/SqwzGdbw
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/AGXIxKyBpc92NSA1QCZr0IuOZoY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 2022?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 16:25:28 -0000
Acee: With that confirmation, I will cancel 1/10/2022. Watch for that message. Sue -----Original Message----- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 11:23 AM To: Susan Hares; 'Jeffrey Haas'; idr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 2022? Hi Sue, Yes - that works for me. Thanks, Acee On 1/7/22, 11:16 AM, "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> wrote: Acee: Would you be able to present the 10 minutes at the 1/24/2021 meeting? Sue Hares -----Original Message----- From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 11:08 AM To: Jeffrey Haas; idr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 2022? Hi Jeff, I can present Monday if we want to precede but it would be good to assure we have a quorum so we can talk about next steps. My presentation wouldn't take more than 10 minutes with questions but not including attendant discussion. I believe our draft meets the requirements in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-autoconf-considerations-01.txt However, we do not specify addition of a route to a loopback address for peering. This COULD be added but we thought it better not to make the discovery mechanism a RIB client. Thanks, Acee On 1/6/22, 12:23 PM, "Idr on behalf of Jeffrey Haas" <idr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote: Working Group, The start of year bustle had caused me to lose track of the fact that we have an interim meeting scheduled for this upcoming Monday. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-idr-01/session/idr Keyur will be returning from a trip soon and Sue has been unavailable for this week, so I own the fault here. Our intent for this Monday meeting had been to discuss any further open proposals for BGP auto configuration and perhaps begin discussion about proceeding with selecting one of them. I believe Acee wanted to present an an update related to the LLDP proposal, but that was the only business I'm currently aware of. Interim meetings provide opportunity for high-bandwidth discussion on topics. We have the timeslot available. We likely have time openings available for other work than auto configuration. Shall we proceed with this Monday's interim session? If so, please feel free to suggest discussion agenda. Please note there is also a planned interim on 24 January where intended topics are BGP-CT/-CAR and general discussions of BGP routes with color. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 2022? Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 202… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 202… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 202… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 202… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 202… Susan Hares