IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 2022?

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 07 January 2022 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBAC3A0ADA for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 08:16:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2_WWe0AhVNSV for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 08:16:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D1FD3A0ADF for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 08:16:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.89.79;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Acee Lindem (acee)'" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 'Jeffrey Haas' <jhaas@pfrc.org>, idr@ietf.org
References: <20220106172239.GA7969@pfrc.org> <D60F0264-290D-4CA6-A288-2B82B9A97AE4@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D60F0264-290D-4CA6-A288-2B82B9A97AE4@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 11:15:47 -0500
Message-ID: <002101d803e1$d94e1e50$8bea5af0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHVPyDHREkU8L/rmJ8qnBq7wq87PQHuR4YfrE3SxkA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/VPaaWNPWhqKDnbO2qZej6Eqmx20>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 2022?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 16:16:05 -0000

Acee: 

Would you be able to present the 10 minutes at the 1/24/2021 meeting? 

Sue Hares 

-----Original Message-----
From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 11:08 AM
To: Jeffrey Haas; idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] IDR interim meeting for 10 January, 2022?

Hi Jeff, 

I can present Monday if we want to precede but it would be good to assure we have a quorum so we can talk about next steps. My presentation wouldn't take more than 10 minutes with questions but not including attendant discussion. 

I believe our draft meets the requirements in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-autoconf-considerations-01.txt

However, we do not specify addition of a route to a loopback address for peering. This COULD be added but we thought it better not to make the discovery mechanism a RIB client. 

Thanks,
Acee

On 1/6/22, 12:23 PM, "Idr on behalf of Jeffrey Haas" <idr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

    Working Group,

    The start of year bustle had caused me to lose track of the fact that we
    have an interim meeting scheduled for this upcoming Monday.

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-idr-01/session/idr

    Keyur will be returning from a trip soon and Sue has been unavailable for
    this week, so I own the fault here.

    Our intent for this Monday meeting had been to discuss any further open
    proposals for BGP auto configuration and perhaps begin discussion about
    proceeding with selecting one of them.  I believe Acee wanted to present an
    an update related to the LLDP proposal, but that was the only business I'm
    currently aware of.

    Interim meetings provide opportunity for high-bandwidth discussion on
    topics.  We have the timeslot available.  We likely have time openings
    available for other work than auto configuration.

    Shall we proceed with this Monday's interim session?  If so, please feel
    free to suggest discussion agenda.

    Please note there is also a planned interim on 24 January where intended
    topics are BGP-CT/-CAR and general discussions of BGP routes with color.

    -- Jeff

    _______________________________________________
    Idr mailing list
    Idr@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email