[Idr] IDR interim on May 16th - webex, questions for meeting, and recordings.
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 13 May 2016 10:47 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F10C12B074 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.739
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zy2eeZZ4FMMO for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2904512B020 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.238;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 06:46:58 -0400
Message-ID: <008a01d1ad04$c63a77d0$52af6770$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008B_01D1ACE3.3F2A3760"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdGtA5N1fQH6ZeaQT8WhQMAKvH+1Fw==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/BmsFu-miN0_SmEbuH36GPVLjJhw>
Subject: [Idr] IDR interim on May 16th - webex, questions for meeting, and recordings.
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:47:10 -0000
The time of the interim is 22:00-23:00 EDT on May 16th. The interim will discuss the following two drafts in order to create a WG solution: . draft-vandevelde-idr-flowspec-path-redirect, and . draft-li-idr-flowspec-redirect-generalized-sid Some of the Questions that will be discuss are included below. Please review the pre-recording presentations prior to the meeting. The Chairs encourage discussion of these questions on the list before, during, and after the meeting. Sue and John ======================== Agenda for IDR Virtual Interim Meeting May 16, 2016 22:00 - 23:00 EDT WebEx: https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=m9be481d19988dd1b545be6759aee267b Meeting number: 649 235 411 Meeting password: Jg66d2pm Join by phone 1-877-668-4493 Call-in toll free number (US/Canada) 1-650-479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada) Access code: 649 235 411 Questions for meeting: Submitted by (Eric Wu) 1. Redirect-to-Specific-Tunnel with BGP Path Attribute [TUNNELENCAPS][MPP] and Redirect-to-IID/GSID, Required by different use cases, can we have two docs in IDR In parallel? [Comparison to Redirect-to-IID/GSID , draft-hao will have more little modification to existing mechanisms, No need to do Mapping /Recursive Lookup.] 2. For IID/GSID, one mapping table for all kinds of segments/forwarding-entities vs. one mapping table per segments/forwarding-entities type, should we support both? Chair Questions: 1) Does the WG feel we need the following for RFC5575bis (DDoS) a) Redirection to VRF, b) Redirection to Indirection to IP, and c) Redirection to Service (new)? 2) If the WG desires redirection to Service routing, does the WG desire a) Next-Hop tunnel support? - b) Next-Hop TE Tunnel support? c) Nested Tunnel support? d) Next-Next Hop Tunnel Support? e) Router localized Tunnel recursion? f) Tunnel Encap Recursion: 3) What pieces of the proposed solutions have been implemented and/or deployed? Presentations (prerecorded, please review prior to meeting): - draft-vandevelde-idr-flowspec-path-redirect Gunter Van De Velde 21 minutes https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/ldr.php?RCID=e01d62661085f660f470feddd9bf266f presentation at: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/05/16/idr/slides/slides-interi m-2016-idr-5-0.pdf draft-li-idr-flowspec-redirect-generalized-sid Eric Wu 20 minutes Streaming recording link: https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/ldr.php?RCID=c8615aa845801a1e4b79cb1708a04484 Download recording link: https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/lsr.php?RCID=4bd504329727d2a811c9cb0c9bc713d8 presentation at: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/05/16/idr/slides/slides-interi m-2016-idr-5-1.pdf
- [Idr] IDR interim on May 16th - webex, questions … Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] IDR interim on May 16th - webex, questi… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [Idr] IDR interim on May 16th - webex, questi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] IDR interim on May 16th - webex, questi… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] IDR interim on May 16th - webex, questi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] IDR interim on May 16th - webex, questi… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [Idr] IDR interim on May 16th - webex, questi… Gunter Van De Velde