Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension Adoption - 9/10 to 9/24 - Adoption process extended (11/24 to 12/8)

Hannes Gredler <hannes@gredler.at> Tue, 24 November 2015 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes@gredler.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1C81A1EF2; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 04:39:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.02
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HtWRoMq52uQM; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 04:39:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gilfert.gredler.at (gilfert.gredler.at [87.106.222.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 344B31A1EEA; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 04:39:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([::ffff:124.40.244.69]) (AUTH: PLAIN hannes, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by gilfert.gredler.at with ESMTPSA; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:39:11 +0100 id 0000000002F681B0.0000000056545A6F.0000142A
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr@ietf.org
References: <054501d126a8$63153330$293f9990$@ndzh.com>
From: Hannes Gredler <hannes@gredler.at>
Message-ID: <56545A6C.5090708@gredler.at>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:09:08 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <054501d126a8$63153330$293f9990$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080803060306060908080708"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/DRO-hmPFiRfXDkhQbdtqVdEwId8>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:21:09 -0800
Cc: draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension Adoption - 9/10 to 9/24 - Adoption process extended (11/24 to 12/8)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:39:18 -0000

not aware of any IPR beyond the disclosed ones; - /hannes

On Tuesday 24 November 2015 04:38 PM, Susan Hares wrote:
>
> Pushpasis and WG:
>
> Thank you for your question regarding 
> draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension-03.txt. The WG 
> adoption call (9/10 to 9/214) has indicated interest in this document.
>
> However, during the adoption process I failed to raise the IPR issues, 
> and this draft has the following IPR disclosure: 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2558/.  Therefore, we will need to 
> extend the WG call to ask the all co-authors to respond to this 
> message if they know of any additional IPR.  After the authors 
> respond, we will do a 1 week WG conformation call that the WG still 
> wants to adopt the work given the IPR.
>
> If you could get your co-authors to quickly indicate their IPR status, 
> it would be helpful.
>
> If you have implemented these TLVs and SUB-TLVs, it would be good to 
> update the list on the implementation status.
>
> Sue Hares
>
> PS – I apologize for missing the IPR during the first WG adoption call 
> period.
>